Discovery airborne, which image!

[jmoffroad33]

Both the photographs were taken at the same time, but my beloved took one with D40 I took the other with a D200, marital bliss is coming to an end which image do you think is the better. We leave it in your hands.

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=34397


http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=34398

 

[V6GTO]

No photos to see...

 

[jule86631]

no 1 for me

 

[whitewash]

id say number 2.


both images suffer from a car covered in grey mud on a grey day so there isnt that much in the way of tonal range, but the first one looks much more washed out than the second

 

[ricky23432]

no 2

 

[Dal]

No 2, purely for the fact you can see the jump and it really gives a feeling of the speed.

Both are good shots though.

 

[gazedd]

i'm liking both, both are different in the obvious ways but tell the same story - This suspension best work!

 

[wack61]

i'm liking both, both are different in the obvious ways but tell the same story - This suspension best work!

and I hope it lands with the wheels straight unless those shots were taken with a 300mm lens

 

[Toothie]

difficult one. i prefer the composition in number 1 but its very washed out.

 

[Yv]

number 2, if only because it doesn't look washed out and a crop would make it as good compositionally as number 1

 

[gazedd]

and I hope it lands with the wheels straight unless those shots were taken with a 300mm lens

 

[Slvrbck]

I like them both but if I had to pick, I would go with number 1.

 

[Matt Sayle]

id say number 2.


both images suffer from a car covered in grey mud on a grey day so there isnt that much in the way of tonal range, but the first one looks much more washed out than the second

 

[jmoffroad33]

Shot number 1 taken with 70 -300mm set at 122mm. Shot number 2 taken with 17 - 70mm set at 17mm. So one of us is sensible and the other one!