Phil Young Messages 6,584 Name Phil Edit My Images Yes 20 Aug 2011 #3 #1's not bad...would benefit from more eye detail. #2 is definitely not for me.
Adam69 Messages 661 Name Adam Edit My Images Yes 20 Aug 2011 #4 Nice detail on #1 Mike perhaps a tad sharper on the eyes, not sure about #2 it's not my cup of tea really but that's not to say it isn't any good.
Nice detail on #1 Mike perhaps a tad sharper on the eyes, not sure about #2 it's not my cup of tea really but that's not to say it isn't any good.
Roy C Messages 3,383 Edit My Images No 20 Aug 2011 #5 #1 is good Mike, I am not sure what's going on in #2 but it looks 'blown' to me.
