- Messages
- 30,298
- Name
- George.
- Edit My Images
- No
I'd argue that point with the RX10 IV I have; The AF is now unbelievable on that, I was capturing swallows successfully with this a few weeks ago.. Its quite a revelation over the RX 3
![I Agree :agree: :agree:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.tp/agree.gif)
George.
I'd argue that point with the RX10 IV I have; The AF is now unbelievable on that, I was capturing swallows successfully with this a few weeks ago.. Its quite a revelation over the RX 3
As stickytape says, the RX10 IV has excellent AF as it has technology from the Sony A9. Mirrorless cameras are now as good as DSLRs for AF speed and the technology has filtered down. The moto-x shot further up this page was taken with my RX10 IV. I took high-speed bursts (20fps) of a couple of starts and nearly all frames are sharp.
Some holiday snaps from Northumberland - all shot with RX10iii
Bamburgh Castle by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Heatherslaw Light Railway by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Bamburgh Castle by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Bench by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Quality Ices by Mike Smith, on Flickr
A couple from the Farne Islands with Sony RX10iii
Puffin by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Kittywake and Chick by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Too kind George, thanksTwo very nice shots, both very nice but I particularly like #2. Very appealing.
George.
Wow those are fantastic!A couple from the Farne Islands with Sony RX10iii
Puffin by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Kittywake and Chick by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Another motocross shot, just because I can and I like this one.
View attachment 249229
Pinned to the sky
Thanks, George. I hope you like the latest pair too.“Excellent” well timed shot, liking this one very much.
George.
Haven’t had much opportunity to use the camera since I bought it. But first images that I’ve taken in anger have really surprised me.
The sharpness of them is simply fantastic, even when pixel peeping
Just got to get to grips with the menu system and using manual mode, rather than auto.
View attachment 249272View attachment 249273
Thanks George - yes agreed and also quite a big crop so not surprising it's slightly softVery nice flower shot, with some beautiful colours.
"Looks even better on Flickr, not your fault but I think the TP compression has taken away some of the fine detail"
George.
Two from today with the RX10iii
Long Tailed Tit by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Bullfinch by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Two from today with the RX10iii
Long Tailed Tit by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Bullfinch by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Three snaps from today with the RX10iii
Linlithgow by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Cormorant by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Swan by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Thanks GeorgeThree “Cracking” shots, nothing more to be said.
George.
Well the macro shots I have posted were shot just with the native lens and no flash - generally at 600mm and f8 or so. They’re not true macro as such but good enough for bigger bugs or flowers etc. You can get as close as about a metre away and with a fairly heavy crop you can get a decent shotOn the macro shots that you guys post with the RX10's (III or iv) are you having to use another lens or Raynox or something? And what about flash?
On the macro shots that you guys post with the RX10's (III or iv) are you having to use another lens or Raynox or something? And what about flash?