- Messages
- 775
- Name
- lewis
- Edit My Images
- Yes
thats been a very interesting read, is there anyway that has a guide to the law for photography, i mean i would love to have a quick read as one never knows when it could come in handy.
Yes. We know.Wooo Hooo! Get stuck in.
The government want to know which laws have infringed your hard-won civil liberties and they want to repeal them.
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/
is dad is a photojournalist so he knows the law and yes he did get a solicitor quick thats what the nuj do.
SECTION 44 SUSPENDED BY THE HOME SEC
The Guardian said:12.24pm: Theresa May, the home secretary, has just announced changes to police stop and search rules in response to a European court of human rights judgment earlier this year.
The police will not be allowed to use section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to stop and search individuals, she said. Section 44 will only be allowed to be used to authorise the search of vehicles. Police officers who want to use the Act to stop and search individuals will have to use section 43 which - unlike section 44 - says officers have to have a "reasonable suspicion" that someone is a terrorist.
She also said that she was changing the rules so that police can only use the stop and search powers in the Act where it is "necessary" for the prevention of terrorism. Previously officers could use these powers were it was "expedient" for the prevention of terrorism.
Alan Johnson, the shadow home secretary, criticised the decision, which May announced in an oral statement in the Commonns. But it has just been praised by the Tory MP David Davis.
great ! finally !!
43 Search of persons
(1) A constable may stop and search a person whom he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist to discover whether he has in his possession anything which may constitute evidence that he is a terrorist.
(2) A constable may search a person arrested under section 41 to discover whether he has in his possession anything which may constitute evidence that he is a terrorist.
(3) A search of a person under this section must be carried out by someone of the same sex.
(4) A constable may seize and retain anything which he discovers in the course of a search of a person under subsection (1) or (2) and which he reasonably suspects may constitute evidence that the person is a terrorist. .
(5) A person who has the powers of a constable in one Part of the United Kingdom may exercise a power under this section in any Part of the United Kingdom
Don't worry...they still have the equally draconian S.43.
Don't worry...they still have the equally draconian S.43.
It's nothing like a draconian as S. 44. as the police officer now has to have "reasonable suspicion" that you are a terrorist which makes it very easy to form a case for harrasment if you are stopped without any justification. The things the Home Secretary says in the rest of her statment are also very positive.
Stop looking for negatives, stop and search powers are never going to be abolished but it does appear that the new government are taking the issue seriously. Hopefully now the MET police will come in line with every other force in the country and stop abusing their powers and we can finally put this issue to bed.
its a start though - and at least you *shouldn't* get searched anymore for just being in London
It's the "reasonable suspicion" bit that worries me to be honest. S.44 had an element of "reasonable grounds to implement a s.44 area" which was so rampantly abused. Given the increasing stock of evidence that police officers can't apply the law sensibly and/or correctly, I don't hold much hope for "reasonable suspicion" to be used reasonably.
Does "reasonable suspicion" include using a camera?
I'm not specifically looking for negatives, but as a pro tog who covers news and public events that put me into contact with the police...I can't see this being a particularly large step. As long as the big scary "T" word is still around, I/we will continue to be harrassed and prevented from working properly. I agree with Stop and Search where there is a proven risk, based on evidence-based intelligence, but at present the current strategy is one of "targeting"...black/asian/photographer/old man with a beard in a park.
This is simply a discriminatory practice that in reality does nothing but alienate the targeted people from the police. I don't view the police as someone to protect me anymore at large-scale public events...I view them as someone to avoid and not engage with for fear of being detained/harrassed or otherwise victimised. Surely that's not the point is it?
How many times have you been a 'victim' of this 'Rampant Abuse'?
You make it sound like every person in London with an SLR will be searched often and repeatedly when in reality it is a minority problem and outside of London is so rare as to be almost unheard of.
You are looking for negatives instead of reflecting positively on the first sign that the new government is taking seriously the issues around stop and seach which the previous government so roundly ignored!
The real problem now will be how this change of policy is communicated to the front line police and whether they understand it. To make it easy for them this short nursery rhyme might help:-
Geogie Porgie PCSO
Chased the togs and hassled them so
But he can't do it anymore
Because they've scrapped Section 44.
Only if you think the stop to be unjustified you can complain and they'll be in the position of perhaps having to evidence the 'report' in court.I predict the arguments will now be along the lines of:
"why have I been stopped?"
"because we have had a report that you were acting suspiciously and are duty-bound to investigate such reports/complaints as they constitute a 'reasonable suspicion' of potential terrorist activity under S43..."
Same shi'ite, different jargon...
We have had the inconvenience of potentially being stopped but without any possible reason to lodge a complaint for a few years....You'll still have the problem and inconvenience of being stopped in the first place though...
I quite like the look of this, sorry if it's been posted allready , but it could well be a positive step.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10619419.stm
if i ever see a police officer in trouble i will turn my back and walk the other way.
if i ever see a police officer in trouble i will turn my back and walk the other way.
and so it goes on when is the home office going realise these officers are breaking the law and do something about it http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-10712745 if i ever see a police officer in trouble i will turn my back and walk the other way.
I appreciate your anger and resentment but I really think that is taking it too far. Surely the inconvenience and infringement of rights caused by an illegal S&S doesn't compare to a police officer maybe getting seriously injured or even killed in the line of duty.
I'm anti Section 43 & 44, not anti police. Sure the police in general are making some serious mistakes and seem to have an attitude problem with these issues but I wouldn't want to see an officer hurt over it.
What I want is a police force that I feel I can trust, have confidence in and feel proud of once more - like I did about ten years ago. I think the best way to achieve that is through education rather than confrontation. By all means resist, complain and protest when they are in the wrong, but let's do it responsibly and keep to the moral high ground.