- Messages
- 307
- Name
- Darren
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have a sigma 18-50 2.8 and was debating to get the tamron 17-50 2.8 ( hence my wanted thread ) what i was wondering apart from the slight wider angle is it worth changing ???
lens compare
- Thread starter smithey1981
- Start date
Sigma test - http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikk...8-dc-ex-macro-review--lab-test-report?start=1
Tamron test - http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikk...pherical-if-nikon-test-report--review?start=2
Nikon test - http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikk...mm-f28-g-if-ed-dx-review--test-report?start=1
have used the tamron for a few years. it is excellent for its value and its performance.
only got rid off it as moving to FX.
also cannot comment on the sigma or nikon variant as not used them.
I think the newer VC version of tamron isn't meant to be any good.
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compa...kkor-17-55mm-f-2.8G-IF-ED___186_0_183_0_173_0
a DXO comparison
Tamron test - http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikk...pherical-if-nikon-test-report--review?start=2
Nikon test - http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikk...mm-f28-g-if-ed-dx-review--test-report?start=1
have used the tamron for a few years. it is excellent for its value and its performance.
only got rid off it as moving to FX.
also cannot comment on the sigma or nikon variant as not used them.
I think the newer VC version of tamron isn't meant to be any good.
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compa...kkor-17-55mm-f-2.8G-IF-ED___186_0_183_0_173_0
a DXO comparison
Last edited: