- Messages
- 57
- Edit My Images
- No
Last edited:
Nice composition and location but you IMHO need the river to be still to pull it off.
I prefer the reflection to be slightly blurred rather than a perfect mirror-like reflection so this works well for me. Guided into the photo by the converging light reflections, good detail on the bridges and well exposed.
I agree that the original image needed a crop because of the 'dead' water. I hadn't noticed that.
Steve, your image is very good viewed as a whole. It makes it a completely different image but I would still prefer just a wee bit of blur. I don't know why. I just do.
There is some blur to it...look under the bridge, its slightly blurred
There is. I now give my official seal of approval to this image too.
It's interesting to see other shots of the bridge and how reflection completely changes the image. Not always for the better and not always for the worse. From a distance Trekmeister's photo is immediately recognisible as the bridge whereas Steve's is perhaps not which might draw the viewer in to look more carefully to see what it is.
? ST4 it is his post and original is image is gone
it ok to comment and say the image has to show the reflection by having still water
but NOT everyone likes full reflections
there was nothing wrong with his original image
now the topic has been change why ?
your comments are welcome but it looks like it has ruined his original post and he removed his pic
sorry t o be negative
I agree, the loss of the original is rather disappointing and maybe because of the comments??
However, it is still on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/nadaman/16616905654/
if anyone wishes to make their own judgement, and I agree that there is room for both pictures.
After all, the Tyne is never still when I have been there and the original shot manages to capture/express this feature well.