- Messages
- 298
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
Im struggling to decide between these two.
Thanks for all your comments guys although i must admit i dont feel any more directed. I think the 7000 was my choice but prefer the size and feel of the 300.
Its horrible having to make choices in the photography world...... :s
Ive had my d7000 for a week now, must say i am very impressed...
But, im still not getting that image quality that i have seen the d7000 produce.
Im guessing its too do with my basic kit lenses i have, the 18-55 and 55-200, but i still thought it would of produced better results than my d3100.
Apart from the nifty fifty i have what lenses we you recommend. I do portrait work, but i am going to start some sports photography.
I was thinkin about a small zoom replacement and lens to cover the sports. Nothing to expensive as budget will be an issue. £600-700.
Any ideas would be much appreciated...
If you use raw there is no "might" about post processing.
The image straight out of the camera will be flat and even soft. It needs work to be seen at it's best.
With jpeg you can set a variety of different levels in camera which may achieve the look you want straight out of camera or do a small amount of work again afterwards.
For your budget by the way, you can get the non OS sigma 70-200 2.8 brand new from Amazon
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sigma-70-200mm-Macro-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001044RIQ
Thanks gad, is that a good thing or a bad thing!!!!
Just a vote for the tamron from me..I recently got one and its a huge step up from the kit lens,i went for vc version and some samples here
http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=407365
That is interesting Jean-Paul as I tested my copy of the vc on a d7000 in store at srs and it performed very well.It wasnt just a few snap shots either I spent some time trying it out.Granted I didnt upload to a pc and inspect but on the camera the results were superb and very consistant:shrug: