Well at least you have a nice new one coming.I'm slightly in shock....
Further to my earlier post about having a fall whilst covering an event.
My Z9 was received by my insurer's 'tech partner' late-ish yesterday afternoon.
Just received a phone call from the guy who is looking after it to say that it is not an economical repair!
It's actually down to the availability of the parts they need, more than a balance of costs. It's repairable but they simply can't get the bits to repair it.
So tomorrow I am due to receive a shiny new replacement via WEX.
I'm shocked that such an innocuous fall wrote it off!
Be careful out there guys.
View attachment 402435
View attachment 402436
View attachment 402437
That's good you're getting a new camera as that way you know there's definitely no other damage. I made a stupid mistake last year and was lifting up my camera backpack without zipping it up so I just felt the weight shift and then a thump as the D750 on the pavement. It was fine aside from a dent but a few weeks later the viewfinder info display stopped working which I realised must have been due to a drop and now almost a year later, the shutter has started playing up which I suspect is related.I'm slightly in shock....
Further to my earlier post about having a fall whilst covering an event.
My Z9 was received by my insurer's 'tech partner' late-ish yesterday afternoon.
Just received a phone call from the guy who is looking after it to say that it is not an economical repair!
It's actually down to the availability of the parts they need, more than a balance of costs. It's repairable but they simply can't get the bits to repair it.
So tomorrow I am due to receive a shiny new replacement via WEX.
I'm shocked that such an innocuous fall wrote it off!
Be careful out there guys.
Long fast primes are never cheap, and this is what this is.The new 135 is getting a lot of very positive coverage, but it seems so far only really from Nikon 'ambassador' types. I don't doubt it's a superb lens, but we need to see more objective opinions. Sample images do seem pretty good though. And to put the price into perspective; Leica lenses for eg tend to cost a hell of a lot more, so perhaps the relatively high price isn't quite so bad. £2699 is still an awful lot of money for most people though.
Just thinking aloud, did Hiscox actually go to Nikon or just decide themselves via their in-house tech team that the camera wasn't repairable? I had an issue with a new to me D5 at the start of this year, the store was happy to repair under warranty but Nikon stated that as it was a 'Pro' camera they had to look after the repair and refused to supply the bits to the store's tech team. I would expect Nikon to be able to repair this as it must be a common issue with Professional's dropping their cameras from time to time.Camera functioned correctly apart from the broken rear screen - my accident occurred at lunchtime and I continued to use the camera for the rest of the day. Very fortunate that there was no lens or mount damage.
I don't get to keep the damaged one, and given the non-availability of the parts I see no point in trying to get it back.
My business insurance is with Hiscox - first time I have had to claim and I am very impressed!
No idea in all honesty.Just thinking aloud, did Hiscox actually go to Nikon or just decide themselves via their in-house tech team that the camera wasn't repairable? I had an issue with a new to me D5 at the start of this year, the store was happy to repair under warranty but Nikon stated that as it was a 'Pro' camera they had to look after the repair and refused to supply the bits to the store's tech team. I would expect Nikon to be able to repair this as it must be a common issue with Professional's dropping their cameras from time to time.
I haven't had the misfortune to damage a camera sufficiently to invoke a warranty claim so not sure how a valuable camera like a Z9 ends up unrepairable, anyway credit to your insurer for dealing with the issue so promptly.
Your last sentence is interesting, not many insurance companies focus on getting the customer up and running, most focus on their profits and how not to pay out. Glad that it has been sorted so quickly.No idea in all honesty.
They did say that there was 'internal damage' as well (maybe the internal end of the ribbon cable?). I was about to hire one to tide me over so that's a factor in their cost equation.
I don't believe that they would be so quick to write it off without good reason, though I am very impressed with how they have dealt with my claim. Their response was definitely focused on getting me up and running as fast as poss.
Some context, you could buy an FTZ, Sigma 135mm ART and Sigma 85 ART for the cost of this. I just couldn't justify it, if I had the Z body.
It's a fair point. personally, I've never got on very well with 3rd party lenses, particularly Sigma, as I've often found them to be somewhat below the quality of Nikkor lenses, both optically and in build quality. Although I do still have a Sigma 28-70 f2.8 zoom from my film days, as Nikon didn't actually do such a lens back then (plus it was very cheap bundled with a camera body). I haven't tried those Sigma lenses you mention though, and I understand their products are held in higher esteem these days. But for me, the deciding factor would be the quality of the images produced; Nikkor lenses are expensive for good reason, not just the brand, so if it was noticeably better, then I'd much prefer to spend the extra.Long fast primes are never cheap, and this is what this is.
Some context, you could buy an FTZ, Sigma 135mm ART and Sigma 85 ART for the cost of this. I just couldn't justify it, if I had the Z body.
I've got the Sigma art primes. Image quality wise, nothing touches them bar moving up to medium format.It's a fair point. personally, I've never got on very well with 3rd party lenses, particularly Sigma, as I've often found them to be somewhat below the quality of Nikkor lenses, both optically and in build quality. Although I do still have a Sigma 28-70 f2.8 zoom from my film days, as Nikon didn't actually do such a lens back then (plus it was very cheap bundled with a camera body). I haven't tried those Sigma lenses you mention though, and I understand their products are held in higher esteem these days. But for me, the deciding factor would be the quality of the images produced; Nikkor lenses are expensive for good reason, not just the brand, so if it was noticeably better, then I'd much prefer to spend the extra.
who's your insurer?Just to round this off I received my replacement Z9 early on Friday morning from WEX. Super impressed with the support from my insurer (never thought I'd be saying that about an insurance company!).
I decided to shut the gate after this horse has bolted by buying 2 silicon covers. Very impressed with these - wish I had gone this route earlier.
Need to be removed for any tripod work but for covering events and outdoors work with clients they are brilliant.
View attachment 402878
Hiscoxwho's your insurer?
Well, having spent a lot on those lenses, then you'll obviously be a bit biased. We've seen how the new Z-mount lenses have routinely been proven to be superior to F-mount equivalents, and in most cases that was already a very high bar. The S-Line lenses have been a game changer for me. If you already have the Sigmas, then yo don't need to change, if you're happy But for someone like myself, looking to get the best possible, then if the Nikon version is better, then that's avery important consideration. Of course, that it's 2.5x the price has to factor, but still, if I was wanting such a lens, then the Plena would be on my shopping list for sure.I've got the Sigma art primes. Image quality wise, nothing touches them bar moving up to medium format.
Few samples here maybe worth looking at.I've been playing around with Z8 raw images downloaded from DPreview as my current editor doesn't support them so want to try out options before purchasing the camera, I'm having some odd issues with the files and wondering are there any other good sites with every day raw samples? When I've been searching I'm coming up against clickbait sites or they're sort of promo shots for the camera.
I came across this so I downloaded the nikon nx studio, once in there I transferred them to my pc in another folder and loaded each individual photo to my goto PP program.I've been playing around with Z8 raw images downloaded from DPreview as my current editor doesn't support them so want to try out options before purchasing the camera, I'm having some odd issues with the files and wondering are there any other good sites with every day raw samples? When I've been searching I'm coming up against clickbait sites or they're sort of promo shots for the camera.
This is a lovely composition Pete the 16-50 kit lens is superb.Another from the Z30 +16-50 kit lens.View attachment 402951
Thanks. I have to say I can't wait for my Zf to arrive as the Z30 I don't get on with. But the 16-50 lens is indeed superb for the size and cost.This is a lovely composition Pete the 16-50 kit lens is superb.
Unfortunately, I sold my XQD card reader with my Z7 when the Z9 arrived and I've just found out it's impossible to update the firmware without one. After an hour of trying I just cannot believe this is true but it is:-New firmware released (4.10) for the Z9 which now adds Birds and Aircraft (ala Z8) to the subject detection options.
Nikon | Download center | Z 9 Firmware
downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com
Unfortunately, I sold my XQD card reader with my Z7 when the Z9 arrived and I've just found out it's impossible to update the firmware without one. After an hour of trying I just cannot believe this is true but it is:-
Snapbridge does not offer a firmware update.
Snapbridge has no options to look for a firmware update.
Yup, doesn't work.
When I searched for the firmware, the first Nikon site that came up didn't list 4.1 yet (European site?) so I had to download it from the American site instead. Guessing this is something to do with it, just 'not on the ball'?You often have to wait a day or two before snapbridge gets the update through.
My Snapbridge identifies that there is an update for my Z9 but I havent updated yet.You often have to wait a day or two before snapbridge gets the update through.
After some advice please ! I’m looking to buy a small camera with decent image quality and some nice small lens options.
Thanks to the 16-50 and 12-28 I have pretty much narrowed it down to either the z50 or zf-c.
I know the main difference is the design and I’ll have to pick them up in a shop - the z50 looks much more comfortable…
Anyone have either/both and care to comment ?
Thanks