- Messages
- 2,835
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I figured that although the 50D was nice and new, great technology, although ISO performance was not all that great.
The 5D was another option, with its full frame goodness and better ISO performance it was the option to go for. But at the same time there was a feeling inside me thinking that the camera would be old, maybe looked after poorly and would not last as long as a new camera.
If only there was an option where there was the improved technology of the 50D with the good old performance of the 5D, also with extra hidden bonuses.
So, I just bought a Canon 5Dmk2 with a Canon 24-70 2.8 lens.
I wonder if it will be much of an improvment over my Canon 400D with sigma 17-70mm lens....
Now I have to count the hours, no, seconds until it arrives in my hands, oh the torture!!!
The 5D was another option, with its full frame goodness and better ISO performance it was the option to go for. But at the same time there was a feeling inside me thinking that the camera would be old, maybe looked after poorly and would not last as long as a new camera.
If only there was an option where there was the improved technology of the 50D with the good old performance of the 5D, also with extra hidden bonuses.
So, I just bought a Canon 5Dmk2 with a Canon 24-70 2.8 lens.
I wonder if it will be much of an improvment over my Canon 400D with sigma 17-70mm lens....
Now I have to count the hours, no, seconds until it arrives in my hands, oh the torture!!!