I do actually. A bit more than a vague BBC article....
There is a difference between doing the 'right' thing in terms of protecting as many people as possible, in order to ease pressure on the NHS etc (via the Lockdown™), with it's associate short term economic impact (much of which could be alleviated with correct government intervention and support); and easing restrictions as soon as possible, which could well have a far greater negative long term impact on society. I accept it's always going to be a balance, but this government will want the flow of money to resume as soon as possible. It's really got nothing to do with wanting to protect ordinary individuals. Not everything has to be about money.
If we lift restrictions too early, and there is a second, much more destructive wave (as many scientist are warning about), and our NHS collapses under the strain, then what do we do?
Yeah, see; easy to see things only in the short term, isn't it?