Some PR/sponsor shots from the weekend
- Thread starter Hodders
- Start date
- Messages
- 149
- Name
- Rikki
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Can I disagree?
I think it works superbly the way it is. If you could see the rest of his legs to the bottom of the shot, I feel it would unbalance the image.
Just my tuppence worth
..MD..
Helen Shapiro
- Messages
- 10,257
- Name
- MonkeyDave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Can I disagree?
I think it works superbly the way it is. If you could see the rest of his legs to the bottom of the shot, I feel it would unbalance the image.
Just my tuppence worth
" I have a thing about things not being grounded...!!! I need to step back sometimes.
"MD
- Messages
- 21,341
- Edit My Images
- Yes
#3 is superb, a really nice use of subtle lighting.
#2 I liked because of the lighting, but thought the face a little bright for the image.
#1 is a great 'product' shot, but doesn't have the impact of the other two. I'd like to see what it looked like with out the reflection and a little shadow
Eitherway - stonking lighting setup on all shots.
#2 I liked because of the lighting, but thought the face a little bright for the image.
#1 is a great 'product' shot, but doesn't have the impact of the other two. I'd like to see what it looked like with out the reflection and a little shadow
Eitherway - stonking lighting setup on all shots.
- Messages
- 385
- Name
- Brad
- Edit My Images
- No
The guy on the bike is the best the others are pretty standard
OP
- Messages
- 951
- Name
- Ben
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks for the feedback guys - The first two were intentionally part of the "standard shots" shot list. The last was me giving a little more imagination and part of the more off the wall shot list.
Client was pleased and sponsors have bought a couple of the images (from the standard shots list BTW).
Client was pleased and sponsors have bought a couple of the images (from the standard shots list BTW).
- Messages
- 3,480
- Name
- Marcus
- Edit My Images
- Yes
No.1 Great shot but for me a touch too much space at the top.
No.2 Again great but for the look of the shot I think the face is too bright with too much shadow in his eyes and you lose them.
No.3 Love the general feel but think the OOC shot could have been a touch brighter then with a lot of contrast added in PP, where I think this would have remained moody, but had a touch more detail.
Nice stuff though and great to see a change from the family portrait work I normally see.
BTW I guess this was done as a free shoot but you held on to the images other than proofs to promote sales?
No.2 Again great but for the look of the shot I think the face is too bright with too much shadow in his eyes and you lose them.
No.3 Love the general feel but think the OOC shot could have been a touch brighter then with a lot of contrast added in PP, where I think this would have remained moody, but had a touch more detail.
Nice stuff though and great to see a change from the family portrait work I normally see.
BTW I guess this was done as a free shoot but you held on to the images other than proofs to promote sales?
- Messages
- 5,275
- Name
- Ryan
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Ben - check out the opening page of Photo Professional mag this month. There's an almost identical shot in there to your first.
I think the first one is very good. Not so keen on the lighting in the second. The light on his face is a tad hot I think.
Last one is very good too and great use of light.
I think the first one is very good. Not so keen on the lighting in the second. The light on his face is a tad hot I think.
Last one is very good too and great use of light.
- Messages
- 7,842
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- No
Think the first two shots are very good.
Like the idea of the third one but it could be anyone, now if the face could be recognisable, it would be my fav.
Like the idea of the third one but it could be anyone, now if the face could be recognisable, it would be my fav.
