For me it's the gf1, built in flash(nx you have to screw it on)
Also look at the epl1/2 by Olympus.
has anyone had any experience with the sweep panorama on the Nex 5 It's looks pretty interesting, especially if it's as flexible as it sounds on the website.The screen could be tilted which ticked a box for me, especially not having to lay on the ground for low shots. 7 frames a second, full HD video, Panoramic, including 3D. Whats not to like
Taken last night in twilight - only comes out as a JPEG.
Had my NEX-5 for a week now and love it - the tilting screen is a Godsend and the pano is pretty good.
Coming from a D700 I was concerned about ISO quality, but it's useable...
Was this taken using the auto-pano (or whatever it's called) feature? Cheers.
The other problem you will end up having with the nex 5 is that the lenses have to be the same or similar size as those of any APS-C DSLR so the main bulk and weight of the system is really the same. I can't imagine how funny a 2.8 70-200 will be on such a camera.
So the camera is small but you don't get a decent small sized lens as the 16mm is not great and a couple other small primes are really expensive (near the 1k mark for a 24mm).
As mentioned above I think the NEX system feels a bit unbalanced at the moment
I would say GF1 or Olympus E-PL2.
The NEX has a better sensor and is awesome when using legacy (old manual) lenses but has no in built IS & nore has the GF1. The E-PL2 does have in built IS. The NEX kit lenses are not great. They are good but not great.
GF1 or E-PL2 with Panasonic 20mm f1.7 ......Awesome!
It most certainly was - it shoots at 1/500th, F2.8 @ 7 FPS and auto stitches them all together, it will also do a 3D pano that can be viewed on a Sony Bravia 3D TV :bonk:
If using small focal lengths then IS is not an issue. I used the Voigtlander 25mm f/4 Skopar on my NEX 5 on Saturday and the results are stunning in my opinion, not the photo as such but the detail and sharpness and feel of the image. Trouble is I just wish it was AF! Zeiss are bringing out a 24mm f1.7 which will be perfect but that is going to cost I recon about £1000!!!
Does anyone actually like the NEX 18-55mm?
No!, i took it off when i got my Zuiko. Not used it since.
I guess i can put up with MF rather than spend £££££'s
What i did on Saturday was set the focus to near infinity and aperture to f/8 and just shot away. Most of the images were super sharp with no camera shake. You just have to remember to shoot stuff thats more than 2 meters away.
So...going back to the OP's question.
GF1/E-PL2 if you want to use AF lenses
NEX if happy using MF lenses as the sensor is SUPERB!
Oh and 1 more thing, there were many complaints about the menu system and digging deep to change ISO and WB. If you upload the latest firmware you can assign sofy keys so most functions are close to hand plus the MF assist makes using MF lenses a dream!
I haven't changed the soft keys yet, and i shoot maual, but i have no problems at all changing anythign in the menu. Once you know where everything is its like everything else. I can change what i want just as quick as i could on my old D90.
also if you buy Sony Alpha lenses you can still make use of the AF.
You shouldn't be disappointed, I loved both my Viv 24s. I even sold my Zuiko 24mm, that's how impressed I was.
Dont suppose someone can give some good advice on decent M42 or FD lenses and adaptors for the NEX as ive just laid my hands on one.
I would love to utilise my EF lenses but it would seem that only one firm is looking at a conversion for electronically controlled aperture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY1Nm6ZDWJs&feature=player_embedded