- Messages
- 845
- Name
- Omar
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Show me where, honestly show me one for 350 used. Obviously there is no point if you can get a 70-200 2.8 L for as little. There might also be the point that the prime is sharper and lighter, and not white [matters to some] - feel like people are arguing against a lens they barely ever heard of just for the sake of it. I don't care which you personally buy, but someone specifically mentioned a 200 2.8 ... maybe read back. I swear this is the only thread where disputes break out over a recommendation - you all hate it yet keep doing it
I've seen them go regularly for £450 or so. £500 from a reputable shop. For the sake of £100, i'd take the versatile lens. Thing is, i'm not looking for an argument here - you appear to be (over and over again) - I was merely pointing out it's a super niche product, as it's not very useful to most people. I didn't even quote your post, tbh.