D
Deleted member 66768
Guest
Mavic Pro nowhere near as good IQ or camera wise. The 2.8 is far too much for something that will be essentially a video lensThe F2.8 is just as small! Also why didn't you get the mavic Pro!
Mavic Pro nowhere near as good IQ or camera wise. The 2.8 is far too much for something that will be essentially a video lensThe F2.8 is just as small! Also why didn't you get the mavic Pro!
wow and its not even out yet
Nothing compared to the depreciation on the Sony A9 lolSony depreciation
Nothing compared to the depreciation on the Sony A9 lol
Very true but think second hand prices have taken a big hit due to the release of the A7R III and A7 III.huh? its only £200 below release price which is not a huge lot if you consider it released at £4.5K
huh? its only £200 below release price which is not a huge lot if you consider it released at £4.5K
Yeah, Harrison's have a couple in stock priced at £3100 each, imagine what they paid the owner(s)..... £2500-2800ish I guess.I think Riz is talking about the used price of an A9 that someone posted the other day at £3k
Yeah, Harrison's have a couple in stock priced at £3100 each, imagine what they paid the owner(s)..... £2500-2800ish I guess.
I guess it was to be expected on what is a niche high-end body...... the main cost of the Sony A9 is its sensor array.
I'l give you 50 quid
Yeah, Harrison's had a couple in priced at £3100 each, imagine what they paid the owner(s)..... £2500-2800ish I guess.
Sony Zeiss 50mm f1.4 by any chance?
thinking 28mm f2
then one of the 85mm's
perhaps the stf lens for something a bit different
This could be true..... to be fair there is nothing wrong with the Zeiss Batis lenses, very good build backed by a 3 year warranty!I think Sony have stopped making Zeiss lenses... May be they had a quiet divorce?
Or possibly because Zeiss started making thier own line of AF lenses (batis)
Harrison's have a used FE 100mm SFT G Master, along side other G Master goodies.. A7R II and A9 bodies etc
This could be true..... to be fair there is nothing wrong with the Zeiss Batis lenses, very good build backed by a 3 year warranty!
The Sony Zeiss 55mm f1.8 is to this day a very stellar lens when you factor in size/weight.
April 1st?I thought april
£2.8K would be optimistic especially on the VAT margin scheme for secondhand goods (VAT registered trader charges VAT on the difference on second hand goods), I'd be very surprised if any bricks and mortar retailer would settle for £250 (£50 to go to HMRC) on a £3.1K sale, especially if they have to handle any second user warranty issues. I would have thought that they would have been offering £2K-£2.4K
If they bought it from a VAT registered trader/photographer then it may be a different issue.
Minor correction but it's 1/6 not 1/5 of the profit that gets taxed on the VAT margin scheme.
What difference would it make if the customer is VAT registered? Wouldn't the profit be roughly the same?
So predictions for this year's Sony announcements ....
Sony A7S III
Sony RX1R III
Sony A6700
Sony A7000
Sony FE 400mm f2.8 G Master
Sony FE 135mm f1.8 G Master
Sony Zeiss FE 35mm f1.8
Sony Zeiss FE 24mm f1.8
I'm not getting into brand loyalty. Whilst I shoot with an A7 now and and A6000 previously, my camera shelf has considerably more film kit on it so my digital gear is just a tool. I'm not suggesting ignoring the problem, I've already said it would be good to understand what's causing it. However, the usual knee jerk reactions of the internet also need to be addressed as, to some, the camera has gone from the best option to completely useless in the space of a few example images. My question was, honestly, how many people actually shoot in these situations where the issue may present itself and then massively crop the image and, more importantly, would actually make the camera useless?
My point is that there is clearly banding of some sort on those examples shared but the reality of the whole image shows that it's only actually visible when magnified on that specific area. I;m not ignoring it's there, just asking for some balance.
DROOLGolly.
As those switches on the 400mm f2.8...
https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/new-sony-400mm-f-2-8-gm-lens-switches-explained/#disqus_thread
Sony A7 III vs the other Sony bodies.....
http://briansmith.com/sony-fullframe-comparison-sony-a7-iii-vs-a7-ii-vs-a7r-iii-vs-a9/
I agree it will sell well, Sony have hit the mark when it comes to price vs performance in the A7 III.
Knowing Sony we'll see an A7 iv, and a7 v, an Ar iv, A9 ii, A9 iii, A9 iv, and no new lensesSo predictions for this year's Sony announcements ....
Sony A7S III
Sony RX1R III
Sony A6700
Sony A7000
Sony FE 400mm f2.8 G Master
Sony FE 135mm f1.8 G Master
Sony Zeiss FE 35mm f1.8
Sony Zeiss FE 24mm f1.8
canon finally getting serious about mirrorless - https://www.dpreview.com/news/80355...nnibalize-dslr-sales-with-mirrrorless-cameras
I'm sure there'll be new lenses from Sony and from the other peeps too.
New mount and there dead before it's out. This is e mount and where talking. Nikon need to answer else there finishedNow that is interesting.
New mount and there dead before it's out. This is e mount and where talking. Nikon need to answer else there finished