- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
wtf???
whats new? wow this has got to be an april fools surely?
whats new? wow this has got to be an april fools surely?
I find it very odd that they didn't upgrade the EVF
SO why not wait until its possible to do 120fps refresh rate at the 5mp evf?Very disappointing. I can see now why they moved the announcement forward given the rumours about specs.
Apparently due to the 120fps refresh rate of the existing EVF, which the new one does support.
Ooh noes the A9II looks a bit crap.
What happened to the 36 mp's etc.
It's actually a laughable upgrade man, doesn't even get the new EVF
I think it may be a flopI am actually raging.
Surely this one will be a huge flop?
All you are really getting is the 2 x UHSII, the anti ficker and the contrast detect a.f points (which to be fair really did need an upgrade).
Sad as it is I am proper gutted, the rumoured specs would have suited me perfectly.
Sony has established a consistent track record for model releases.
1. New model with groundbreaking design and features.
2. Fix the beta issues in the first model.
3. Actual upgrade.
4. Upgrade no one asked for.
Who would’ve guessed the same week Canon fixes and improves its Eye-AF, Sony brings out something new that does less than a firmware upgrade.
Time to go back to Canon
The lack of f1.2 primes must be killing you inside
Still competitive compared to its rivals when you take into consideration price vs performance.£4799.
Ouch.
Well This is not good, im happy with my a7r4 200/600 set up but really hoped the a9 mkII would be even more remarkable -it isn't at all and im not sure I want to buy a a9 thats a few years old.
May just buy the Olympus 150/400 when it's out for my EM1X .
Rob.
Still competitive compared to its rivals when you take into consideration price vs performance.
If I recall correctly, the A9 was £4499 when released, so its only a marginal increase given that the £ isn't as good as it used to be.
Your right, £3399 vs £4799.The problem is the difference in price between this and the original A9 which are pretty much the same.
I am actually raging.
Surely this one will be a huge flop?
All you are really getting is the 2 x UHSII, the anti ficker and the contrast detect a.f points (which to be fair really did need an upgrade).
Sad as it is I am proper gutted, the rumoured specs would have suited me perfectly.
Your right, £3399 vs £4799.
I think the A9 II is firmly aimed at the professionals who needed these extra features to help the move to Sony perhaps?
The smart buy would be the Sony A9... same AF system, same resolution etc.
Maybe Sony have a killer firmware upgrade planned for the A9 II, who knows.
Is there new eye af as good as Sony one?Can you imagine if Canon releases a dual UHS-II, 1D level mirrorless in Photokina with their new eye-AF firmware?
Then again....it will be like £6k, and £3k for a L-glass....a bit rich for me!
Can you imagine if Canon releases a dual UHS-II, 1D level mirrorless in Photokina with their new eye-AF firmware?
Then again....it will be like £6k, and £3k for a L-glass....a bit rich for me!
Is there new eye af as good as Sony one?
Same here, I'm really happy with the A7RIV but wanted the A9II to be my wildlife/sports camera and although I wasn't expecting the rumoured 36MP I was expecting an increase, I was expecting more FPS and I was certainly expecting a new EVF.
I'm sure Canon and Nikon will sleep a lot better tonight.
Does it? I more worse than the a7r3?How are you finding the a.f accuracy with the A7RIV?
it reviews quite poorly.
How are you finding the a.f accuracy with the A7RIV?
it reviews quite poorly.