What different look? IMHO the "different look" should be mostly created in camera with depth of field and composition, then nicely processed in either colour or black and white. Anything else is going to be a gimmick.
I do agree essentially with what pete is saying but I,m sure you meant enhancements which IMHO is perfectly acceptable, you could try
http://gettotallyrad.com/#rockin-actions-for-adobe-photoshop-7a1d9
http://www.kubotaimagetools.com/
A little expensive but both widely used and well regarded in the wedding profession
Wayne
Doesn't your "signature" look come from a downloaded plug-in though Pete?What different look? IMHO the "different look" should be mostly created in camera with depth of field and composition, then nicely processed in either colour or black and white. Anything else is going to be a gimmick.
No thanks. I don't want my pictures to look like yours.
But, the OP asked about actions and you seem to take a "get it right in camera" stance, which I agree with but the majority of the pictures you post on here rely heavily on post processing. I just don't understand the disconnect.
The processing is an action bought from Totally Rad
Also I've made the decision to dump the original style I was using for this 365. I found a group of photographers who use it and what hit me was that you couldn't tell their work apart. Its totally download a style and off you go. I don't like that. People say they like the processing on these photos and all I did was push f8 to run the action. That doesn't feel right. So I'm dumping it and going back to learning more rather than coping out.
Yer I felt that it was a bad idea to be using a downloaded action. Cut & paste photography isn't for me. Its too easy to do that really. Its better to be inspired and create than to simply download and replicate.
ok to start with im not sure why you would think someone with the name Julien would be a woman.
Pete you make some fair points but maybe you have to give the customer what they want and if that's a certain 'style' then who are we to argue with them, styles and fashions change as do actions...
I'm the photographer they're hiring. If they want a certain style they come to me. If they want another style, they go somewhere else. I'm not about to start doing selective colouring, stupid wedding cliches or turn up in a clown outfit just because you're supposed to give the customer what they want.
Actually all my previous wedding clients hired me for my style, not because its what their friends got. People don't hire me to produce something they can get elsewhere. People hire me to produce what I do best. I've had clients say "Can you do it like this?" and I've explained to them why I feel its not a good look. They're hiring me as a photographer, not me as a guy who can use a camera. Processing is a big part of that. I also don't use downloaded actions from other people. By the way, I think you're keyboard is broke. That is a lot of commas.
Hi,
anyone know a good link to get some photoshop actions from to add some nice effects to wedding photos ?
thanks
Now that you have read all that, what do you intend to do?
Hopefully give the customer what they want and pay for ... :shrug:
If a bride wants selective colouring .... Then let her have it!
If she wants a vignette, yeah you guessed it .... Let her have it.
If she wants to get married in a brown dress .... ?????
It's supposed to be the best day of her life .... Not the photographers ... :nono:
Took the words right out of my mouth, Kevin.
What the bride wants, goes. If she hired a cake-maker .. the cake-maker would make the cake that the bride wanted...... not what she herself wanted. thats ludicrous.