Recent content by einaroh

Correct they gather the same amount of light, the lens will behave like a F2.7 DOF-wise

hi, Your 18-55mm is 27-82.5mm (in 35mm/FX eq.) and your 35mm is 52.5mm (in 35mm/FX eq). You basically just multiply all lenses with the appropriate factor, in this case 1.5, to get what they would be for a lens on a 35mm/FX body.

maybe the Nikon 85mm 1.8G, haven't tried it myself but its supposed to be pin sharp and has good bokeh

I had issues with back focusing, all I needed to do was adjust the AF-Fine tune and now it is spot on

This looks really good, you could even have the Nikkor 70-200 f4 for just a bit more for a lighter/sharper lens if you dont need the 2.8-4 range

yeah your right, I corrected it, thanks :)

why not just buy the D7000 and use the money you saved (350 GBP pound cheaper + a 100GBP cashback from nikon) for a 17-50 2.8 and a 70-200 2.8?

80% Aperture 10% Shutter 10% Manual

You're going to have a hard time going to Jessops since they are bankrupt. You could check out Calumet right next to Euston.

http://www.lensesforhire.co.uk/nikon-wide-angle-17-c.asp, have you tried here?

:plusone: the only thing I have to add is that the new Tamron 70-200 VC is supposed to be pretty good but priced at 200GBP below the Nikon I would go for the Nikon.

Hi, To be able to help you it would be really helpful to know your budget for the new lens.

Thats just how cheap it is :). Given your budget I would just buy either the 35mm or 50mm. The extra reach the 50mm gives you is equal to taking 1-2 steps forward. I would not recommend spending money on training, the internet has a lot of sites (including this one) with almost all the info...

I think the best thing you can do is just bring a tripod and lower the shutterspeed until you get a decent pic :)

wow ok didn´t know this could be this serious! I´ll learn how to dive properly before I start thinking about taking my camera gear under water. Thanks guys! :)