Sorry if I’m being thick but surely 70-300 won’t give you the reach of 150-600 and being full frame won’t give you the “crop factor” zoom either so isn’t that gain in lightness offset against a loss of reach?
I suppose if you aren’t going to shoot over 300 then it definitely is a gain
Is the D850 not heavier than the D500 and if so does that not offset advantage gained by using lighter lenses on D850?
That’s the whole reason I was posing my question. ISO capabilities seem better and better nowadays but I’m not sure I’d want to shoot over a 6400 if I could help it.
I’m asking not to buy but just to learn why certain cameras may be rated better.
My camera is 12MP and I’ve got some large quality prints which I’m happy with so I know Mp isn’t everything but just want your thoughts.
Another scenario example: Assuming D500 and D850 were both either fx or dx...
How do you judge which is better? Is megapixels everything?
I was wondering as most users seem to class the D500 as the best DX camera out there yet megapixels are lower than entry level D3500.
Do you rate the D500 better due to its focussing speeds and...
wow for that high an iso it's good. I have been thinking of upgrade from D90 mainly as I don't like the noise on that camera and while I was looking at the D850 I have also been looking at this mainly as I can use my current dx lenses.