Recent content by The Warlock

Bought both the 55-250 and the 70-300 is usm new, i must say, its not better than the 55-250, a little longer and feels more solid. It was "highly" recommended to me by a guy at a store innplace off my 55-250. I believed him, but it wasnt better. I have taken good photos with it, but are they...

Owned the 17-85 and took alot off good pictures with it too(i thought), then i replaced it with the 17-55,wow, the 17-55 is amazing. Should have been an L for its optics, but the bulid is not in L flavour. 2.8 IS ring USM, do i need to add on that:cool:, 15-85 is supposed too be good aswell...

I had the 55-250 for a couple off months and upgraded to the 70-300 is usm, and i would say no. I liked the 55-250 better actually. The 55-250 will also come in a mark II variant i July...