and please use their services
Kate Middleton's Mother's Day photo appears manipulated?
- Thread starter Annet
- Start date
- Messages
- 1,230
- Edit My Images
- No
Now I'm beginning to doubt whether the Queen even met Paddington, admits royalist
THE doctored Mother’s Day photograph of Princess Kate has a royalist questioning whether the Queen actually met Paddington Bear for her Platinum Jubilee.
www.thedailymash.co.uk
- Messages
- 9,006
- Name
- Rob Telford
- Edit My Images
- No
Kensington Palace, but otherwise this
- Messages
- 9,006
- Name
- Rob Telford
- Edit My Images
- No
The Guardian, with access to the EXIF data, say the picture was taken with a Canon 50mm f/1.2 lens, which probably rules out the smartphone hypothesis
‘Multiple frames were likely used’: the royal photo’s telltale signs of editing
Guardian’s imaging team identifies 20 anomalies with the picture that may require further inquiry
OP
- Messages
- 72
- Name
- Annet
- Edit My Images
- No
Well, yes, compared to other problems our world currently has it's nothing, but we are allowed to pay attention to minor things, you know
- Messages
- 7,903
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
Aye. But they don't then send them to press agencies with an embargo for release on Mothers Day.
The real issue is why those agencies didn't pick up on the alterations (20 according to the Graun) before releasing the picture.
- Messages
- 9,075
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I think I know what the photographer has done:
Taken multiple images, a burst, or more than one burst, and merged a number of them into one. I don't know if the merging's been done manually or otherwise.
Personally I think it's a good technique, you capture everyone smiling/laughing/eye-contact, 4 x split second actions in one. OK, you may need just 2 or 3 shots to get all 4 looking the way you want. Then there's the hands, added interest, doing something interesting/different, nothing rude.
The result is normally better, less rigid than the old "say cheese" technique.
Taken multiple images, a burst, or more than one burst, and merged a number of them into one. I don't know if the merging's been done manually or otherwise.
Personally I think it's a good technique, you capture everyone smiling/laughing/eye-contact, 4 x split second actions in one. OK, you may need just 2 or 3 shots to get all 4 looking the way you want. Then there's the hands, added interest, doing something interesting/different, nothing rude.
The result is normally better, less rigid than the old "say cheese" technique.
Last edited:
Mr Bump
From under the bridge
- Messages
- 9,629
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- Yes
yeah i suspect its quite innocent i mean the poor lass just wanted to pop out a nice family piccy
Conspirisy theorists will find something where there is nothing because they want to find something.
ie NASA didnt send anyone to the moon it was all done in the desert.