High skill/high quality photography being rejected as AI?

As AI replaces ordinary photographers the incredible and extraordinary will become expected and so it's likely to be assumed any amazing photo is synthetic.
 
For me, his key message is around 9:03 - get back to the basics of good photography, engaging with the people etc. I think this is especially true for live events. People still want, and are paying for, great photos. At least where I am.
 
PS, going through the airport over Easter, I noticed the electronics shops only had action cameras and film cameras...
 
sk66 said:
Just stumbled across this. I don't generally like Tony's/Chelsey's stuff, but I found this one interesting.

View: https://youtu.be/zkdO-q9zJec?si=3lrzyYpnvsVZ27ng
Click to expand...
I haven't watched this, but...

I've picked up on a few wildlife photographers who, through hard work and a bit of luck, have captured some extraordinary pictures, which have then been rudely dismissed, because "they had to be AI". Including condemnation around AI destroying the planet, and that wildlife photographers using AI should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Just goes to show how far The USA is behind the UK. We in the UK have been using the word "cringe" for decades, Acording to Tony he has only recently discovered it. :rolleyes: ;):ROFLMAO:
 
It's the coachman problem.

At one time, a good coachman was needed to get people from A to B and you needed a coachman for every four to eight travellers. Along came those steam trains and three specialists (driver, fireman and guard) could get a hundred or more travellers to their destination. Coachmen became less in demand but a good coachman was still wanted by those passengers who required a more specialised service.

The "Artificial Intelligence" tools will suit the hundred or so who just want the result as cheaply as possible but the specialist photographer will continue to have a niche serving those who want something different
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top