Photos scanner options

Messages
1,163
Name
Maciej
Edit My Images
No
I'm preparing myself to scan loads of old photos and was wondering, which model would you recommend nowadays?
Last time I had a scanner was in 90s ;)
I'm seeing that Canon LiDE 400 is often recommended.
 
Last edited:
A lot depends on what you are trying to scan: prints, slides, large format negatives, 120 or 135 film, or odd formats like 110 or 126!
 
A lot depends on what you are trying to scan: prints, slides, large format negatives, 120 or 135 film, or odd formats like 110 or 126!
Like I said - just photos - old, printed photos.
 
Like I said - just photos - old, printed photos.
For scanning in printed photos almost any newish multi-function printer/scanner/copier will do a half decent job. I've had a cheapo consumer Canon PIXMA something for about 4 years which is perfectly acceptable for scanning in prints.

The Canon has bundled software which is fine for the purpose.

A quick read of https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/canon-canoscan-lide-400 gives a good, positive account of it's photo scanning capabilities. Of course with any scanner like this you are limited to one pic at a time. You can fill the flatbed up with photos but all the images will then be in one file.

I've not been able to compare the max resolution between my multi-function scanner and the Lide 400 but I suspect the 400 will be higher resolution than my all-in-one.

Most folk in this part of the forum will be scanning in negatives and that may be part of the reason you've had so few replies. Negative scanning is a whole different ball game!
 
For scanning in printed photos almost any newish multi-function printer/scanner/copier will do a half decent job. I've had a cheapo consumer Canon PIXMA something for about 4 years which is perfectly acceptable for scanning in prints.

The Canon has bundled software which is fine for the purpose.

A quick read of https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/canon-canoscan-lide-400 gives a good, positive account of it's photo scanning capabilities. Of course with any scanner like this you are limited to one pic at a time. You can fill the flatbed up with photos but all the images will then be in one file.

I've not been able to compare the max resolution between my multi-function scanner and the Lide 400 but I suspect the 400 will be higher resolution than my all-in-one.

Most folk in this part of the forum will be scanning in negatives and that may be part of the reason you've had so few replies. Negative scanning is a whole different ball game!

Thanks, it looks like those modern scanners are simple solution for scanning prints.
Unfortunately I do not have films for thsoe photos, when I was a kid, dad used to develop them, print and throw away films, we did not keep them back in 80s.
Now when I'm getting towards end of the trip, I thought I would scan all my family photos and keep them digital as well.
I guess I'll buy one of those flatbeds and scan one after another.
 
Back
Top