High-end bridge cameras: Sony RX10iv, RX10v, Panasonic FZ1000 etc

As Alby has said, for BEST results, use a "proper" macro/close up lens on your interchangeable lens set-up. However, a close up "filter" in the 10 bag is a LOT easier to carry on the off chance you'll want/need it. An MP-65 set up on a Canon DSLR might be a bit OTT!!!
 
As Alby has said, for BEST results, use a "proper" macro/close up lens on your interchangeable lens set-up. However, a close up "filter" in the 10 bag is a LOT easier to carry on the off chance you'll want/need it. An MP-65 set up on a Canon DSLR might be a bit OTT!!!
:LOL:Absolutely! I had the MPE way back and it was a swine to use - no autofocus, no manual focus, no nothing :oops: :$
 
Ruddy darter with the rx10 iv and Nisi 72mm achromat. I think the Nisi achromats are pretty decent.


Male Ruddy Darter by Ajophotog, on ipernity
Great catch Alby :)

I think the Nisi is 3-4 diopters and the Sigma is 1.8 - ie a lot less powerful which is what I want to just get me a wee bit closer at 600mm? Hope that makes sense!

But I take your point that it'll never match a dedicated macro lens - I just want to see how close I can get... (pun intended - sorry)
 
While out walkabout I stumbled upon this lovely "Cotton Lavender" growing in a council run garden and figured it was well worth a Snap.

"Cotton Lavender"

NF00165-Cotton Lavender .JPG
 
Not a hint of CA in there, Alby. Guessing that that Nisi is a 2 element "filter"?
 
Not a hint of CA in there, Alby. Guessing that that Nisi is a 2 element "filter"?
Taken from the Nisioptics site.

NiSi’ s Close-up lens is made of double optical corrective glass with

an apochromatic design. It features a muti-nano coating to give

advanced resolution and a natural color, with almost no purple/green

fringing, both within focus.
 
Tempting! I feel an attack of GAS coming on!!!
 
So I got a couple of shots this afternoon of the same subject as below - the first with the Sigma diopter and the second without... I got closer with the diopter on, no question, but there's a commensurate loss of DOF the closer you get so in all honesty I marginally prefer the second (the file size is smaller due to a heavier crop but it's still adequate for laptop viewing (to me anyway)). They look a bit rubbish on here but not too bad on Flickr I think :)


Smaller Skipper (1) by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Small Skipper (2) by Mike Smith, on Flickr
 
Maybe my last image on here as I am giving up photography for a bit as I've been struggling with my eyesight lately. Hopefully be back soon. It's been a blast ;)


Tenby by Ajophotog, on ipernity
All the best Alby - very much hope to see you back in the future, you and your images have been a real asset to the forum.
 
Maybe my last image on here as I am giving up photography for a bit as I've been struggling with my eyesight lately. Hopefully be back soon. It's been a blast ;)


Tenby by Ajophotog, on ipernity

Sorry to hear that Alby, I've really enjoyed your input. I wish you well my friend and hope to see more of your work in the future.
 
Maybe my last image on here as I am giving up photography for a bit as I've been struggling with my eyesight lately. Hopefully be back soon. It's been a blast ;)


Tenby by Ajophotog, on ipernity
That’s sad to hear Alby, hope you will be back soon ;)
 
Tempt me with a price in the for sale section!
 
About £500, I reckon... :whistling:
 
I still use my Sony RX100 mk1 for situations where you can’t take a big camera or just to carry around in pocket
Its still better than my iPhone for anything low light especially for things like band photography
I shoot raw then process in DXO , took one of my favourite ever shots with the little Sony
I did look for a newer alternative but there just isn’t anything available new that does the same thing , a range from wide to 100mm equivalent that is as small as the RX100 mk 1 with a decent sensor size, the Sony is 1 inch, bigger would be awesome
There are small removable lens cameras but security doesn’t let you in with those for concerts/gigs
 
Last edited:
I upgraded my Mk 1 for a later model to get the extra reach. Being lazy and not enjoying PP at all, I shoot JPEG and accept the limitations that might bring.
 
I upgraded my Mk 1 for a later model to get the extra reach. Being lazy and not enjoying PP at all, I shoot JPEG and accept the limitations that might bring.
For most things the JPEGs from the RX100 are excellent, I just go for raw when really pushing it in low light as ISO 3200 is noisy with that camera but DXO gives excellent results
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nod
The King is Dead... Long Live the King! After 10 years of happy snapping with my RX10iv, I now have an RX10v! :D :D :D

Sorry - quite excited! Initial observations - better screen and viewfinder, much faster and more accurate focussing, handles nicely - feels quite similar but maybe just a bit higher quality. First snap as below - seems sharp enough to me!


Carder Bee by Mike Smith, on Flickr
 
My offer of £500 (once it's listed in the correct section, of course!!!) stands!!! :P
 
The King is Dead... Long Live the King! After 10 years of happy snapping with my RX10iv, I now have an

"Congrats" on that Mike, (y) I'm sure you'll capture some excellent pic's with it.
 
Last edited:
The King is Dead... Long Live the King! After 10 years of happy snapping with my RX10iv, I now have an RX10v! :D :D :D

Sorry - quite excited! Initial observations - better screen and viewfinder, much faster and more accurate focussing, handles nicely - feels quite similar but maybe just a bit higher quality. First snap as below - seems sharp enough to me!


Carder Bee by Mike Smith, on Flickr
Not looking quite as good as the MK4 Mike.:exit:
 
I'll wait for the 5 to drop a bit then!
 
Back
Top