Why would I buy a Fisheye lens?

B

Bob Monkhouse

Messages
69
Name
Bob
Edit My Images
Yes
I have just had a Canon R7 bought for my birthday and,after lots of prevaricating and for probably the first time in my life I have not only asked for advice but have actually taken the advice given to me on this forum ( Thank you to all members for your invaluable advice) I have bought a new Canon 100-400 lens to go with it. With the converter also bought I can use the lenses from my 600D. Theae being a 18-55, 55-250 and the 50mm f1.8.
I have always fancied a fisheye from back in the 80's when using the Olympus OM2n I had.
Why would I need one of these? I'm going to buy one at some point as I think the images they create are interesting but ,like my knowledge of photography in general, my knowledge of fisheye lens is poor so the other question being- Where would I use one? Thanks for any and all advice,Bob.
 
Why? FUN! I have them for both the Nikon FF system and the Fuji crop bodies. Both are full 180° circular image types and deliver the expected fisheye distortion.

I have used them for whacky shots of people and animals as well as taking crops of the central band for 180° panoramic shots, although I tend to crop those down to around 120° to lose the very distorted edges. I managed to find both at sensible prices - not sure I'd spend much more than £150 on one.
 
Hardly anyone NEEDs a fisheye, but lots of us enjoy playing with them occasionally.

I started out with fisheye adapters that screw onto the front of a normal lens - these vary hugely in quality going from mediocre to apaulling.
So I've ended up getting some proper ones firstly a 10-17 fisheye zoom for APSC , then a couple of fisheye primes for MFT (9mm BCL & a 7mm), one for the pentax Q...

My first legacy FF fisheye was no better than the adapters, but the Nikon one I got after works quite well adapted onto my A7ii.

Here are a few from the 10-17 - Variable amounts of distortion, ultra wide FOV, and deep DOF

Stour woods fisheye by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr

big grin by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr

Something fishy by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr

Fishy Rufus 2 by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr


My MFT fisheye shots often include IR into the equation for even more weirdness.

The BCL with 680 filter held in front (& edges cropped to hide my fingers)
Fisheye IR by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr

The 7mm with a filter touching the hood
Fisheye filter test by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr

The adapted nikon allows filters behind the lens so works better for IR

If I want more than 180 degree FOV I switch to a Kaidan 360 (a special mirror which goes in front of the lens)
NEPW - P1080495 small by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
For when straight lines are far too boring. For when you want to stand 3" in front of something and still fit all of it in. They focus about 3cm off the front element so great for shoving in animals faces.

I still miss my Tokina 10-17mm fisheye, that was a utterly lovely thing, but (AFAIK) there isn't a FF equiv (and no the 8-15mm etc are not an equiv).

I worried the Tok would be a one trick pony on the crop sensor and loved it so much, when I moved up to FF I think the 15mm Fisheye arrived before the 5D did. Yes that's more of a one trick pony, but when it comes out of the bag I love it. You think the RF 16mm is bendy, then you put the fisheye on and realise the 16mm isn't even trying.

They really aren't for everyone. But also, I'm reminded I haven't put mine in the bag for far too long, so its going out next time...

Canon 400D & Tok 10-17mm

IMG_6775.jpg


Canon 5D & 15mm Fishy

20100219-IMG_1619.jpg

20100305-IMG_2237.jpg
 
LeeRatters said:
Why?

Because you can't be bothered to step backwards....?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
To be fair at some locations now, because people you can't get close for people taking selfies with iPhones. I've been setup carefully with 17-40 and waiting for the moment and people just jeep standing in front of you and you're like **** it, stick the fisheye on, I'm winning this game...
 
I am quite happy with my Panasonic 9mm lens on the pana G9ii. just avoiding photo distortion but have that extra field of view
 
I booked of the converter things back in film days. Got a few nice shots with it.
These days I don't go much wider than 10mm though.
They can be fun though.
 
LeeRatters said:
Why?

Because you can't be bothered to step backwards....?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Stepping back would give a completely different image. Quit often with a fish eye I have to step forwards (as well as change lenses) so it's definitely not can't be bothered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nod
Nod said:
Why? FUN! I have them for both the Nikon FF system and the Fuji crop bodies. Both are full 180° circular image types and deliver the expected fisheye distortion.

I have used them for whacky shots of people and animals as well as taking crops of the central band for 180° panoramic shots, although I tend to crop those down to around 120° to lose the very distorted edges. I managed to find both at sensible prices - not sure I'd spend much more than £150 on one.
Click to expand...
That's the kind of thing I intend to do, I had a computer program around 25 years ago that would change images similar to a fisheye- or so I believed- and as you say they were fun images,I haven't even fired up the new R7 yet but maybe it's time I got creative instead of blasting away and hoping for the best.
 
GreenNinja67 said:
If you don't know where you'd use one you don't need one.
Click to expand...
I have some idea but I've never seen one in real life as it were so was hoping for some suggestions, I've seen a couple for the 600d I have been using for the last 15 years and since I've now got a better body I thought I would have a go with one,I've got the adapter for the R7 so I can use the Canon lenses I already have.
 
Jonnybrad2001 said:
For when straight lines are far too boring. For when you want to stand 3" in front of something and still fit all of it in. They focus about 3cm off the front element so great for shoving in animals faces.

I still miss my Tokina 10-17mm fisheye, that was a utterly lovely thing, but (AFAIK) there isn't a FF equiv (and no the 8-15mm etc are not an equiv).

I worried the Tok would be a one trick pony on the crop sensor and loved it so much, when I moved up to FF I think the 15mm Fisheye arrived before the 5D did. Yes that's more of a one trick pony, but when it comes out of the bag I love it. You think the RF 16mm is bendy, then you put the fisheye on and realise the 16mm isn't even trying.

They really aren't for everyone. But also, I'm reminded I haven't put mine in the bag for far too long, so its going out next time...

Canon 400D & Tok 10-17mm

View attachment 495119


Canon 5D & 15mm Fishy

View attachment 495121

View attachment 495120
Click to expand...
Thanks,some great ideas there,I need to wait a couple of months before I get one,my better half is still in shock over what I've just spent on the 100-400, she'll have forgotten by Christmas.
 
LeeRatters said:
Why?

Because you can't be bothered to step backwards....?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Now theres a point.I'm accident prone,my children refer to me as Mr Bump so it's very likely that if I stepped back somewhere without looking there's going to be a 1000ft drop into a river full of crocodiles. Although thinking about it there aren't many 1000ft drops around Huddersfield and I'm sure we don't have crocodiles, still,it looks like a good reason to buy a fisheye.
 
So you can take images of fish eye's
 
tijuana taxi said:
So someone can get a bargain when you sell it on hardly used.
You can then buy a macro lens with the proceeds and move that on too after a short period.
Click to expand...
Now there's a thought,I wasn't thinking of a macro lens,I'll have to see where I can find some brass to waste on one of those as well.
 
LeeRatters said:
Check the emoji's at the end of my post ;)(y)
Click to expand...
I'm buggered if I can turn my emoji things on,I use them all the time but my comments on here look far too serious without them. - there's supposed to be a slapped face and several rofl emojis there, I must look harder.
 
GreenNinja67 said:
If you don't know where you'd use one you don't need one.
Click to expand...
It's the odd and wacky shots with them I find interesting and it is something I have wanted for a long time,back in the olden days of 35mm film I used an Olympus OM2n with several different lenses but not a fisheye,if I remember correctly the fisheye lenses were quite expensive so I never bought one, good quality lenses these days seem to be more within my limited finances, I've seen used ones around £200 so if(when) I buy one it will be an affordable toy. Someone else suggested buying a macro lens so I can keep that in my camera bag alongside the fisheye then eventually pass them on ,totally unused and at a loss. Still,it might make it look like I know what I'm doing, a bit like all the fishing gear I've bought to go fishing with my 9 year old Grandson, as the saying goes, All the gear and no idea. Thats me.
Graham W said:
They do come in handy sometimes.

View attachment 495164View attachment 495165View attachment 495166View attachment 495167View attachment 495168
Click to expand...
Stunning images! Now all I have to do is convince my wife that it's something I really, really need. Along with the macro lens someone else suggested I buy.
 
Bob Monkhouse said:
, All the gear and no idea. Thats me.
Click to expand...
Hardley! With no fisheye & no macro the first bit is just something you aspire to :)
I suspect the no idea bit is probably also wrong, even if you're like me and never quite follow your ideas through to the maximum.

FWIW even with hundreds of lenses, and a wide range of bodies etc. I still find GAS telling me I fall short of 'all the gear'.
 
How else can you take a photo of your feet and the sky simultaneously in landscape format?
 
chuckles said:
How else can you take a photo of your feet and the sky simultaneously in landscape format?
Click to expand...


A full fisheye only has a round format, no portrait or landscape! :P
 
Graham W said:
They do come in handy sometimes.

View attachment 495164View attachment 495165View attachment 495166View attachment 495167View attachment 495168
Click to expand...
What is the particular lens you have used?
Jonnybrad2001 said:
For when straight lines are far too boring. For when you want to stand 3" in front of something and still fit all of it in. They focus about 3cm off the front element so great for shoving in animals faces.

I still miss my Tokina 10-17mm fisheye, that was a utterly lovely thing, but (AFAIK) there isn't a FF equiv (and no the 8-15mm etc are not an equiv).

I worried the Tok would be a one trick pony on the crop sensor and loved it so much, when I moved up to FF I think the 15mm Fisheye arrived before the 5D did. Yes that's more of a one trick pony, but when it comes out of the bag I love it. You think the RF 16mm is bendy, then you put the fisheye on and realise the 16mm isn't even trying.

They really aren't for everyone. But also, I'm reminded I haven't put mine in the bag for far too long, so its going out next time...

Canon 400D & Tok 10-17mm

View attachment 495119


Canon 5D & 15mm Fishy

View attachment 495121

View attachment 495120
Click to expand...
So what would you recommend for the 600d I have bearing in mind a budget of £200? I've just got a new R7 plus the adapter to be able to use the set of lenses I already have for the older camera.
 
Petrochemist said:
Hardley! With no fisheye & no macro the first bit is just something you aspire to :)
I suspect the no idea bit is probably also wrong, even if you're like me and never quite follow your ideas through to the maximum.

FWIW even with hundreds of lenses, and a wide range of bodies etc. I still find GAS telling me I fall short of 'all the gear'.
Click to expand...
I like taking photos,or rather pictures as I'm no photographer but now my son has bought me a new camera and I've bought a decent 100-400 for the pictures of my Grandchildren on the rugby pitch I was looking at fisheye lenses out of curiosity and found them not too expensive second hand,as I've said elsewhere I always wanted one 40 odd years ago for my OM2N but the price of them at the time was out of reach for someone as poor as me, now they are within reach I'm going to get one but not before I can work the R7 properly. Someone also made the mistake of mentioning a macro lens which has also set me of thinking I need one of those as well. Doh! A fisheye lens will be in my possession before Christmas followed by a suitable macro but again it's going to have to be £200 ish. What would you recommend? Bearing in mind it's for a Canon 600d and I can then use it on the R7
 
Bob Monkhouse said:
What is the particular lens you have used?

So what would you recommend for the 600d I have bearing in mind a budget of £200? I've just got a new R7 plus the adapter to be able to use the set of lenses I already have for the older camera.
Click to expand...
It's been a while (long while) since I looked at crop sensor lenses, but Tokina 10-17mm fisheye zoom every time. Should be easy on the budget.

It's a bonkers 180º rectilinear (so square image, not a circle in the frame which personally I'm not a fan of) fisheye at 10mm, but to stop it being a one trick pony, zoom in to 12-15mm and it's just a bendy bonkers super wide angle lens. So it's not the usual fisheye one trick pony.
 
Bob Monkhouse said:
What is the particular lens you have used?

So what would you recommend for the 600d I have bearing in mind a budget of £200? I've just got a new R7 plus the adapter to be able to use the set of lenses I already have for the older camera.
Click to expand...
A Nikkor 16mm 2.8 D First pic on a D3s, the rest on a D750

I'll be flogging this lens as soon as I find a replacment Z mount! Any ideas?
 
I like fisheyes, even those allegedly horrible "screw on to the front of your standard lens" lens ones...

Buildin in Exmouth fisheye adapert Minolta SR1s 1977_12_01.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top