- Messages
- 8,193
- Name
- Pat MacInnes
- Edit My Images
- Yes
A guy at work has just spent a small fortune on new gear, the centrepiece being a gripped 5D mkII (he also got a 24-70 f/2.8, 100-400mm IS and a 17-40mm - lucky sod ) and although I'm severely impressed by the performance capabilities of a full frame 21mp sensor with such sweet lenses, after a bit of use I'm not at all convinced.
Why? I use a D200 and it's got great handling, no doubt about it - ISO and WB button in the right place, a rear command dial that's right on your thumb (and a front dial right on your index finger) and it's generally as easy to use under pressure as you'll get but the 5D's handling and button configuration just seems so clumsy and badly designed that I just can't see it as a serious outdoor photographers camera. It's fine for the studio where you can take your time but watching everyone in the office playing with it (they all use Canons by the way) is painful to say the least, and that's purely down to button configuration.
Changing modes is a fiddle - Canon still haven't managed to fit a smooth dial wheel to its cameras - and the ISO/WB/AF buttons are just too small, plus fiddly when you need to change settings because of the clunky command dials.
Although the handling is pretty good compared to smaller cameras (none of which can rival its IQ though), alongside something like a 30 or 40D it doesn't seem that much of a step up. Okay, grip it up and it is substantial and more like a 1D or a D2/3 but the plastics, although tough, just feel a little clinical without and real texture or feel.
Before you think 'oh yeah, a Nikon fanboy', I used Canons for 10 years and never thought twice about their great design, especially in the olden days when models like the 5 and the 3 were the dog's bits. Plus, I'm not convinced about these gimmicky add-ons like HD video we're seeing on the likes of the D300s and the D90. However, looking through the selection of DSLRs there are out there, Canon just don't seem to be taking any great strides to improve how digital SLRs should feel in the hand in general, more taking technology further but with bad design as the trade-off. Is that really what the leading consumer brand should be all about?
I am rarely disappointed when it comes to modern digitals *after all, they're so much more than we could have even imagined back when we were slaving away in the devving rooms at the lab - but for such a large investment of money, not to mention the furore that the release of this model created when it was originally mooted and announced, it really does seem like a bit of a anti-climax of great proportions.
I'll probably be linched by a few 5D and EOS users but sorry, I'm just no impressed by the design of what's supposed to be a class leader...
Why? I use a D200 and it's got great handling, no doubt about it - ISO and WB button in the right place, a rear command dial that's right on your thumb (and a front dial right on your index finger) and it's generally as easy to use under pressure as you'll get but the 5D's handling and button configuration just seems so clumsy and badly designed that I just can't see it as a serious outdoor photographers camera. It's fine for the studio where you can take your time but watching everyone in the office playing with it (they all use Canons by the way) is painful to say the least, and that's purely down to button configuration.
Changing modes is a fiddle - Canon still haven't managed to fit a smooth dial wheel to its cameras - and the ISO/WB/AF buttons are just too small, plus fiddly when you need to change settings because of the clunky command dials.
Although the handling is pretty good compared to smaller cameras (none of which can rival its IQ though), alongside something like a 30 or 40D it doesn't seem that much of a step up. Okay, grip it up and it is substantial and more like a 1D or a D2/3 but the plastics, although tough, just feel a little clinical without and real texture or feel.
Before you think 'oh yeah, a Nikon fanboy', I used Canons for 10 years and never thought twice about their great design, especially in the olden days when models like the 5 and the 3 were the dog's bits. Plus, I'm not convinced about these gimmicky add-ons like HD video we're seeing on the likes of the D300s and the D90. However, looking through the selection of DSLRs there are out there, Canon just don't seem to be taking any great strides to improve how digital SLRs should feel in the hand in general, more taking technology further but with bad design as the trade-off. Is that really what the leading consumer brand should be all about?
I am rarely disappointed when it comes to modern digitals *after all, they're so much more than we could have even imagined back when we were slaving away in the devving rooms at the lab - but for such a large investment of money, not to mention the furore that the release of this model created when it was originally mooted and announced, it really does seem like a bit of a anti-climax of great proportions.
I'll probably be linched by a few 5D and EOS users but sorry, I'm just no impressed by the design of what's supposed to be a class leader...