77mm filter
- Thread starter gtc
- Start date
A lot a people would suggest not using one because it can interfere with the image quality, especially by causing flare. If you do want one though, B+W, Heliopan, Rodenstock and Hoya's Pro1 and HD ranges are all high-quality filters. You'll find lots of suppliers on the web. Expect to pay upwards of £40 for a good one in that size.
- Messages
- 3,696
- Name
- Frank
- Edit My Images
- Yes
* No UV/'protective' filter can improve image quality on a dSLR.
* All UV/'protective' filters will cause some degradation in image quality.
* The seriousness of this degradation tends to decrease as filter cost increases.
* Good filters will cause degradation that is not noticeable under most conditions.
* All filters, even the best, will cause noticeable degradation in some conditions.
- Messages
- 1,818
- Name
- James
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have a Hoya pro1 on my nikon 17-55
- Messages
- 380
- Name
- Si
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Personally, although its an expensive lens, its reasons like this ^^ why i havent got a UV filter on my Canon 24-105mm. However, that said, if i was to buy one, id go for a Hoya Pro-1 Digital, the 77mm one is quite expensive for what it is but then agin, what 77mm filter isnt expensive?
Si
- Messages
- 1,818
- Name
- James
- Edit My Images
- Yes
However, that said, if i was to buy one, id go for a Hoya Pro-1 Digital, the 77mm one is quite expensive for what it is but then agin, what 77mm filter isnt expensive?
Si
£35 on Amazon, I wouldn't say it was that expensive.