- Messages
- 8,400
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- No
I wonder if anyone can help. I like to heavily process evening landscape/sunset images a lot and currently have M4/3 gear only. I have had APS-C and full frame before but find M4/3 so much fun to use and easier as it's less weight etc. When I had a 6D I found that the RAW files were a joy to process. Loads of data and sharp files. I could get a lot from them. With M4/3 it 'seems' that there is less information from the RAW files to play with. I'm not sure if this is the case or if I'm just being daft. SO, my question is:
3 cameras, 1 Full frame, 1 APS-C and 1 M4/3
All 3 are 16 Megapixel, Would I get more RAW data to play with in editing with the larger sensor?
I'm guessing yes because a 16 megapixel compact will not give the same IQ as a 16 megapixel FF camera. I'm guessing as each pixel is larger you get more light and better IQ but actual usable editing data is the bit I don't really understand. Is there more of it in larger sensors?
M4/3 seems to be great for normal daylight photography but when push comes to shove they are not quite there in low light situations or am I wrong.
Thanks in advance.
3 cameras, 1 Full frame, 1 APS-C and 1 M4/3
All 3 are 16 Megapixel, Would I get more RAW data to play with in editing with the larger sensor?
I'm guessing yes because a 16 megapixel compact will not give the same IQ as a 16 megapixel FF camera. I'm guessing as each pixel is larger you get more light and better IQ but actual usable editing data is the bit I don't really understand. Is there more of it in larger sensors?
M4/3 seems to be great for normal daylight photography but when push comes to shove they are not quite there in low light situations or am I wrong.
Thanks in advance.