andy_fozzy
SPAM Merchant
- Messages
- 7,450
- Name
- Andy!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I ask because I'm currently using a Nikon D7000 (which I adore) and a Sigma 170-500mm (which is rubbish!)
Ok that's a bit harsh. When conditions allow it's pretty good. I've had some great shots from it. But I miss as many as I keep, and yesterday just added to the despair.
Really getting into wildlife more and more, and yesterday I was about a hundred yards away from a buzzard which took off as soon as it saw me. Fired away and all my shots were crap :bang:
I can't afford to keep missing stuff like this!
In my eyes, I don't see that there's anything better for me out there, on my budget. ZERO!!
I'm not looking at getting another Sigma as all the long Sigma's I've had just don't cut it for me.
And I can't see a Nikon lens that would be any better. Not many good reports about the 80-400 which *may* have been an option.
The other thing I'm considering is going back to Canon and getting the above combo.
I don't want to do it, but don't see any other way around this.......
Ok that's a bit harsh. When conditions allow it's pretty good. I've had some great shots from it. But I miss as many as I keep, and yesterday just added to the despair.
Really getting into wildlife more and more, and yesterday I was about a hundred yards away from a buzzard which took off as soon as it saw me. Fired away and all my shots were crap :bang:
I can't afford to keep missing stuff like this!
In my eyes, I don't see that there's anything better for me out there, on my budget. ZERO!!
I'm not looking at getting another Sigma as all the long Sigma's I've had just don't cut it for me.
And I can't see a Nikon lens that would be any better. Not many good reports about the 80-400 which *may* have been an option.
The other thing I'm considering is going back to Canon and getting the above combo.
I don't want to do it, but don't see any other way around this.......
Last edited: