I love my GF1, but I have a reasonable budget that I could spend on a nice DSLR. I have been getting some paid work, and for a few reasons I have been considering getting a DSLR in addition.
1) Faster AF/less shutter lag
2) Better high ISO performance
3) More lenses available, especially wide and long options
4) People take you more seriously as a photographer
5) I like shiny new toys
While I kind of like the idea of full frame - I'm not sure if it's worth it for me (I don't plan on shooting weddings!), and the cost of buying decent FF lenses seems pretty high. So I think I've pretty much narrowed it down to something along the lines of a Canon 7D or a Nikon D300(s) - but I really can't make my mind up. Have had a play with both - I think maybe I preferred the handling on the Nikon, but I like the movie mode on the 7D. Also no live histogram on the Nikon is a bit lame.
As far as I can see high ISO performance seems to be fairly similar.
Also it seems like maybe equivalent Canon lenses are slightly cheaper/more available s/h than Nikon? Sorry for the annoying thread but does anyone have any sensible thoughts on this?
Oh and in terms of what I shoot - paid stuff is often gigs or events/festivals etc (but not events as in flogging pictures to individuals). But I like shooting landscapes/wildlife/people too.
Or maybe it doesn't really matter and either one would be great and I should stop agonising!
1) Faster AF/less shutter lag
2) Better high ISO performance
3) More lenses available, especially wide and long options
4) People take you more seriously as a photographer
5) I like shiny new toys
While I kind of like the idea of full frame - I'm not sure if it's worth it for me (I don't plan on shooting weddings!), and the cost of buying decent FF lenses seems pretty high. So I think I've pretty much narrowed it down to something along the lines of a Canon 7D or a Nikon D300(s) - but I really can't make my mind up. Have had a play with both - I think maybe I preferred the handling on the Nikon, but I like the movie mode on the 7D. Also no live histogram on the Nikon is a bit lame.
As far as I can see high ISO performance seems to be fairly similar.
Also it seems like maybe equivalent Canon lenses are slightly cheaper/more available s/h than Nikon? Sorry for the annoying thread but does anyone have any sensible thoughts on this?

Oh and in terms of what I shoot - paid stuff is often gigs or events/festivals etc (but not events as in flogging pictures to individuals). But I like shooting landscapes/wildlife/people too.
Or maybe it doesn't really matter and either one would be great and I should stop agonising!

