Unfortunately there are no alternative Canon ultra wide angle lenses. You could consider Sigma 12-24mm or Tokina 16-28, but neither are as sharp as the 16-35mm by Canon.
To hell with gear heads talking about over lap is what I'd say. If those 2 lenses do what you want them to do, then put them into your bag.
My usual bag contents are 24-105 f4L, 17-40 f4L and 35 f2. There's major overlap at 35mm but if I can get the shot, then why not?
The alternative is Zeiss 21mm or TSE
ah right, thanks for the clarification. Doesn't seem to be a lot of those lenses about.Tokina 16-28 is far sharper than 16-35mm, but you don't get filter thread with the former. 16-35mm is really not great, probably due to terrible quality control :thumbsdown:
The alternative is Zeiss 21mm or TSE
24-70mm is a decent lens. I have somehow got a fairly good copy and that gets used where possible.
Morning,
Have finally decided to switch to 5D mkiii and am looking at lens now.
Is it worth getting these 2 lens (mainly shoot landscape and scenery) due to overlap? Am i better saving money and going for something different?
If so what.....
Thanks
I have been looking at either the Zeiss 21mm or 18mm as my wide solution.
Doesn't seem to be much to decide between the two!
Ignore the 18, I had a similar trilemma and after much research found the 18 came in 3rd place for choice. The 21 is tops if you want prime, the 16-35 is the choice if you want zoom, despite Tomas' understandable reservations.
To the OP, I have both the 16-35 and 24-70 (albeit Nikon) and they serve me well. I'll use the 16-35 up to 28mm, and the 24-70 from 28 onwards (its the perfect overlap as the omitted focal lengths are their respective weaknesses). I find the 24-70 does most of what I want.