- Messages
- 911
- Name
- Ben
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi
After using Nikon, I bought a 35mm 1.8G which was just over £100 and really good value for money. The cheapest 35mm I can find at the moment is £230 and thats for a f2 35mm.
Any reason why canon's 35mm are so much more expensive than Nikons? I can get a 50mm canon 1.8 for under £100.
But thats too tight to treat as a walk about lens on a crop body.
Is there a sigma/tamron version cheaper?
After using Nikon, I bought a 35mm 1.8G which was just over £100 and really good value for money. The cheapest 35mm I can find at the moment is £230 and thats for a f2 35mm.
Any reason why canon's 35mm are so much more expensive than Nikons? I can get a 50mm canon 1.8 for under £100.
Is there a sigma/tamron version cheaper?