- Messages
- 174
- Name
- Phil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi everyone. I posted last week about having all my camera gear stolen in a burglary at my house.
The insurance company has said they would replace my 24-70 and Siggy 85mm like for like and have ordered them from WEX ( still waiting for them ).
Because the camera body was £95 over the single item limit of £1500 they are going to send a cheque for that amount ( a bit more actually to cover camera bag and flash etc )
I'm now thinking.... I have the opportunity of effectively buying a 5dmkIII for half price, or for only £800 if I bought from Digital Rev! I know I paid the original £1500 anyway but it was a year ago and I don't feel like I'd be spending it again, if that makes sense.
But before the burglary I was perfectly happy with my mkII, and was planning on getting the 100mm IS macro soon to add to my collection and broaden my photography, and the 70-200 f2.8 II at some point money allowing!
Am I better off sticking to the mkII and putting money towards new glass, or do I snap up this opportunity to have an up to date camera body!?
I'm interested to see what any of you would be inclined to do if you were in this situation? I know it's down to me to decide but I really am stuck on this like you wouldn't believe!
Would you see this as a perfect opportunity to effectively get one for a great price??
Any opinions or comments welcome! Cheers
The insurance company has said they would replace my 24-70 and Siggy 85mm like for like and have ordered them from WEX ( still waiting for them ).
Because the camera body was £95 over the single item limit of £1500 they are going to send a cheque for that amount ( a bit more actually to cover camera bag and flash etc )
I'm now thinking.... I have the opportunity of effectively buying a 5dmkIII for half price, or for only £800 if I bought from Digital Rev! I know I paid the original £1500 anyway but it was a year ago and I don't feel like I'd be spending it again, if that makes sense.
But before the burglary I was perfectly happy with my mkII, and was planning on getting the 100mm IS macro soon to add to my collection and broaden my photography, and the 70-200 f2.8 II at some point money allowing!
Am I better off sticking to the mkII and putting money towards new glass, or do I snap up this opportunity to have an up to date camera body!?
I'm interested to see what any of you would be inclined to do if you were in this situation? I know it's down to me to decide but I really am stuck on this like you wouldn't believe!
Would you see this as a perfect opportunity to effectively get one for a great price??
Any opinions or comments welcome! Cheers