Close up shots of nature - what do I need?

Messages
118
Edit My Images
No
I have a Canon 500d, kit 18 -55mm IS lens and 55 - 250mm IS lens.

I would like to get some shots of flowers and other wildlife - close up. What sort of lens do I need for this please?
 
For flowers a macro would be nice, anything from 50mm or longer. I have a 50mm f2.5 and a 150mm f2.8 and I use them both for flower shots.

For wildlife I guess it depends upon the size of your subject and how far away it is, but it'll probably be a long prime or zoom.
 
It depends just how "close-up" you want to get and (as Alan asked) what sort of wildlife you want to shoot.

The 18-55mm that you already have has quite a short minimum focusing distance, and you can get reasonably close shots of flowers / insects and the like with just that (and a little practice).

These are a few of mine that I've taken with that lens, just cropped slightly for composition.


Hoverfly in flight with white Heather3 by SarahLee1001, on Flickr


Hoverfly on yellow Potentilla flower 2 by SarahLee1001, on Flickr


22 Quality by SarahLee1001, on Flickr

If you want to get closer than these you'll need to be looking at either investing in a dedicated macro lens (as suggested above) or supplementing the kit that you already have by adding extension tubes or a "close-up" filter that sits in front of the lens.
The Raynox DCR-250 is highly rated and at around £30 from Amazon is good value for money.
 
Last edited:
The Raynox DCR-250 is highly rated and at around £30 from Amazon is good value for money.


Can you show me where this is approx £30?

Appears to be £43 from amazon direct, or £40 from amazon marketplace sellers.

Would definitely get one at £30
 

:shake: That's a shame . . . and it's gone up by A LOT more than the VAT increase too.
A week ago they were on there for £31 + P&P !!!

So these make my kit IS lens into a macro lens is that correct?

Not strictly speaking a macro lens - the Raynox is a magnifying attachment that you can fit onto the end of any existing lens - it will allow you to get in really close to your subjects and magnify the object too.
If you do a search on here for it, I'm sure that I've seen a few threads about it lately.
 
Another vote for the Raynox (and yes, I'm sure it was ten quid less on Amazon last week!).

For bugs and beetles, get the DCR-250; for flowers and butterflies, get the DCR-150. They will both work best on your 55-250 :thumbs:

Here are 17,000 sample images I prepared earlier :D http://www.flickr.com/groups/raynoxdcr250/
 
Ok great thanks. Can you use filters too? I have a UV and polarising one on. Although the polarising one doesnt seem any good?
 
Ok great thanks. Can you use filters too? I have a UV and polarising one on. Although the polarising one doesnt seem any good?

If you're going to wait for them to come down in price, then get plenty of practice in with the equipment that you have already. As I said, you'll find that you can get fairly close-up with your current 18-55mm and perfecting your technique with that will make the Raynox easier to use when you do get one.

The Raynox has a 49mm thread at the front, so in theory yes you could use a filter with it if you wanted to.

. . . and yes, I'm sure it was ten quid less on Amazon last week!. . .

I can 100% confirm that it was, because I bought one :lol:
It arrived yesterday - just put my first test shots up in the Macro section.
 
Ok great thanks. Can you use filters too? I have a UV and polarising one on. Although the polarising one doesnt seem any good?

Do you know how and when to use a polariser?? In what way is it no good?
But to answer, no I dont think you can use filters on the raynox.
 
Do you know how and when to use a polariser?? In what way is it no good?
But to answer, no I dont think you can use filters on the raynox.

Hi...read one of the many books I have and it says twist the polariser to remove glare on windows etc. Did this although seems to make no difference.

Will use my kit lens first and see how I go. Thank you all
 
Back
Top