- Messages
- 4,626
- Name
- Kevin
- Edit My Images
- No
Totally unscientific. Sat feeling crap and bored. So, 2 shots. First one at 12800 iso in poor light. Second at 10,000 iso, same light.
Both taken in Raw, but converted using Adobe DNG converter. My CS4 wont work with the D4 RAW's.
Only resized for the web. No other pp done at all. No contrast, noise control etc.
This is for those that are wondering if it's as good as the D3s. It's certainly as good as my old one..
1.
iso 12800
[/url][/IMG]
2.
10,000 iso
[/url][/IMG]
Maybe when I feel better, I'll do something more scientific. Maybe not though. It's good enough for me.
Kev.
Both taken in Raw, but converted using Adobe DNG converter. My CS4 wont work with the D4 RAW's.
Only resized for the web. No other pp done at all. No contrast, noise control etc.
This is for those that are wondering if it's as good as the D3s. It's certainly as good as my old one..
1.
iso 12800
2.
10,000 iso
Maybe when I feel better, I'll do something more scientific. Maybe not though. It's good enough for me.
Kev.
they just don't understand ...