Hi all,
I am not sure if I have a bad 50 1.8 or not, has anyone had similar experience to me?
I got the 50 1.8 to go on my 450D almost a year ago but was never happy with its focus ( I assumed it was DOF as I was shooting close people indoors) so it didn't come out of the bag much & I was a little disappointed with it.
I have now upgraded to a 7D, 17-55 2.8, 10-20 & 24-105 f4L and was shooting an indoor handbell concert in a very dark room a couple of nights ago. The 17-55 and the 10-20 nailed the focus 95% of the time, the other 5% I just re composed to focus on the tiny lights over the music scores & it had enough light to get focus.
These 2 lenses were 2.8 & 3.5 but performed brilliantly, however when I tried the 1.8 (expecting big things on the 7D) it was awful, not even getting focus on the lights! :bang:
Is it a bad copy or am I faulty in my logic?
Any help would be appreciated!
I am not sure if I have a bad 50 1.8 or not, has anyone had similar experience to me?
I got the 50 1.8 to go on my 450D almost a year ago but was never happy with its focus ( I assumed it was DOF as I was shooting close people indoors) so it didn't come out of the bag much & I was a little disappointed with it.
I have now upgraded to a 7D, 17-55 2.8, 10-20 & 24-105 f4L and was shooting an indoor handbell concert in a very dark room a couple of nights ago. The 17-55 and the 10-20 nailed the focus 95% of the time, the other 5% I just re composed to focus on the tiny lights over the music scores & it had enough light to get focus.
These 2 lenses were 2.8 & 3.5 but performed brilliantly, however when I tried the 1.8 (expecting big things on the 7D) it was awful, not even getting focus on the lights! :bang:
Is it a bad copy or am I faulty in my logic?
Any help would be appreciated!