few shots from early morning
- Thread starter danmon_81
- Start date
- Messages
- 18,182
- Name
- Geof
- Edit My Images
- Yes
1 and 4 appeal most
the rest are in the same vein but dont have the impact
4 is a great composition and texture shot
however all being 100 2.8 dont have tremendous dof...and that is probably what you have tried to use as a forte...but only 3 deserves it
ps is that 100 the digital size or 35mm equivalent
cheers
geof
the rest are in the same vein but dont have the impact
4 is a great composition and texture shot
however all being 100 2.8 dont have tremendous dof...and that is probably what you have tried to use as a forte...but only 3 deserves it
ps is that 100 the digital size or 35mm equivalent
cheers
geof
- Messages
- 18,182
- Name
- Geof
- Edit My Images
- Yes
cheers...what's that equivalent to on 35mm
on my 4/3 you double the digital focal length for the 35mm equivalent
i reckon you were shooting at around 200mm...which at f2.8 explains the mid band of sharpness
cheers
geof
- Messages
- 521
- Name
- dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
no.1 and no.3 for me 
no1 is a cracker the b+w conversion really gives atmopsphere, nice sharpe focus too.
no3 is all about the lighting and the small dof, i like this as it is but you could have tryed a larger dof just enough to include the water drop aswell.
no1 is a cracker the b+w conversion really gives atmopsphere, nice sharpe focus too.
no3 is all about the lighting and the small dof, i like this as it is but you could have tryed a larger dof just enough to include the water drop aswell.
