Glasgow shots

The third has some promise but I think a more constrasty conversion would help. The second has some interesting colours and textures but is not wonderfully composed - nothing draws the eye through the shot. The first wanted a thinner depth of field to draw the eye to a plane in the shot.

HTH

Phil
 
Thanks Phil,

Re no1: I shot it at f1.8 with a 35mm prime. I'm not sure I could have got shallower depth of field. I take your point, though, the eye is drawn to the beams on the roof rather than the figures.
 
I think I'd prefer number 1 without the figures, or maybe with an interesting sharp figure. The beams are great, a good strong, gritty image possible there I think.

I like number 3 too and agree with Phil about contrast. Also would prefer that one without the car.

Nice sharp lens. I've got mine on my camera practically all the time.

Rob
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top