- Messages
- 15,377
- Name
- Jeff
- Edit My Images
- No
trick or treat ? by jeff and jan cohen, on Flickr
Not quiet sure what you mean.. this is a backlit shot with the sun lightening the top of the head .It must be a trick as their heads are usually red around the beak patch.
The face patch around the beak is usually red but in your photo it looks decidedly orange.Not quiet sure what you mean.. this is a backlit shot with the sun lightening the top of the head .
It must be a trick as their heads are usually red around the beak patch.
As you say, there's often variation in colouration but I can't recall seeing one as orange as that before..... I have dozens of Goldfinch photos as they visit my wildlife garden many times a day throughout the seasons and also bring their young. There can be slight variation mostly due to maturity but Jeff's bird is has normal plumage.
Some individual bird's red can be slightly orange - In fact it's how I recognise one particular regular visitor.
- I have noticed this orange/red feather change myself, where they appear more orange at this time of year, but more red into the breeding season.The face patch around the beak is usually red but in your photo it looks decidedly orange.
I've had a quick Google and orangey ones definitely exist (or lots of people have the same colour balance issue!), but I can't recall seeing one that orangey round here. It could well be me not noticing or perhaps a regional variation? I'll have to pay more attention to them in future.- I have noticed this orange/red feather change myself, where they appear more orange at this time of year, but more red into the breeding season.
Russ
again as I said to someone yesterday it looks perfectly normal on my i.mac and i.pad and i.phone so I would suggest the problem lies more with your colour settings than mine .and I will also re-iterate ITS A BACK LIT BIRD WITH THE SUN SHINING ON THE TOP OF ITS HEAD if you look you will see the lower half is darker :banghead::banghead::banghead:
Simply the way I like it Jim .. each to there own.. although I may well turn it down after having it pointed out to see If it makes a difference .. still on a learning curve with OlympusLooking at the Exif data I see you have the saturation set to 'high', is this in camera and is there any reason for this? I'm not familiar with Olympus.
Thanks for the information; I'd not noticed that before but it will give me something to look out for this winter whilst they're scoffing the sunflower hearts from the bird feeders and throwing anything they think is sub-standard to the chaffinches and dunnocks on the ground.Juvenile/first year Goldfinch are orange, adults are red. View attachment 259299
just taken a look at it in camera menu Jim .. I have picture mode set to "vivid" which is how I like it but every other setting is at zero .. so its obviously a pre-set camera thing didn't think I had changed anythingLooking at the Exif data I see you have the saturation set to 'high', is this in camera and is there any reason for this? I'm not familiar with Olympus.
The face patch around the beak is usually red but in your photo it looks decidedly orange.
If you shoot in RAW that shouldn't make any difference to the file, just the camera's screen (at least that is normally the case, I don't use Olympus)just taken a look at it in camera menu Jim .. I have picture mode set to "vivid" which is how I like it but every other setting is at zero .. so its obviously a pre-set camera thing didn't think I had changed anything
It's looks like it's just the lighting to me, the same back light is making the edge of the bird white but we know it isn't
.... Really? You're a professional and should see that it's upper lefthand top lit - Look at the branch. The whites are losing a bit of detail. If it was directly backlit the edges around the whole subject would be white (or similar colour).
But all this really doesn't matter two flying figs if Jeff is happy with it overall as a picture.
Btw, I love your Aldeburgh calendar - Superb compositions and colours.
If you shoot in RAW that shouldn't make any difference to the file, just the camera's screen (at least that is normally the case, I don't use Olympus)