CT
TPer Emeritus
- Messages
- 26,617
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I've been playing with the evaluation version of Photomatix off and on for a while and thought I'd post my thoughts on it as HDR seems to be increasingly popular. Don't consider this a 'How to' by any means, I'm very much at the experimental stage.
I just nipped out and took this shot... well two shots actually, one exposed for the foreground and one exposed for the sky
Both shots were hand- held and should really have been taken on a tripod. The software does a fair job of aligning the two images for you, but there are limits obviously and there was a slight breeze, hence some of the blurred foliage.
You can either use Photomatix to just combine the two images, or to generate a HDR image from the two shots, which I've done here. The result initially looks awful, but don't panic, you now need to apply tone mapping to bring out the best of both images in the one shot. There are a few sliders to control at this point, but it's not rocket science and the software largely does a good job anyway, producing an image with a huge tonal range, but looking usually rather flat. You can now make contrast and other adjustments to your HDR image within the software, but the options are rather limited and I've tended to save the shot at this point and make final adjustments in PSP. I don't profess to be any authority at all on this and it's just the way I've taken to working with it.
It's an impressive technique without a doubt, but I think you need to be restrained in it's application to avoid some of those HDR images which look more like a cross between a painting and a computer generated graphic, unless that's the effect you want of course, and it isn't always an unpleasant one. Over-sharpening definitely seems to me to increase that tendency.
I've tried to be restrained in the shot above. It looks a bit surreal maybe, but the subject matter contributes a lot to that I think. It's definitely a useful technique, and I would think it's a boon to the landscape people. I might even buy it, but having seen the price, I'll have to think about that.
I just nipped out and took this shot... well two shots actually, one exposed for the foreground and one exposed for the sky
Both shots were hand- held and should really have been taken on a tripod. The software does a fair job of aligning the two images for you, but there are limits obviously and there was a slight breeze, hence some of the blurred foliage.
You can either use Photomatix to just combine the two images, or to generate a HDR image from the two shots, which I've done here. The result initially looks awful, but don't panic, you now need to apply tone mapping to bring out the best of both images in the one shot. There are a few sliders to control at this point, but it's not rocket science and the software largely does a good job anyway, producing an image with a huge tonal range, but looking usually rather flat. You can now make contrast and other adjustments to your HDR image within the software, but the options are rather limited and I've tended to save the shot at this point and make final adjustments in PSP. I don't profess to be any authority at all on this and it's just the way I've taken to working with it.
It's an impressive technique without a doubt, but I think you need to be restrained in it's application to avoid some of those HDR images which look more like a cross between a painting and a computer generated graphic, unless that's the effect you want of course, and it isn't always an unpleasant one. Over-sharpening definitely seems to me to increase that tendency.
I've tried to be restrained in the shot above. It looks a bit surreal maybe, but the subject matter contributes a lot to that I think. It's definitely a useful technique, and I would think it's a boon to the landscape people. I might even buy it, but having seen the price, I'll have to think about that.