- Messages
- 3,348
- Name
- Scott
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I know you will be getting bored with comparisons between these two lenses but having only used the 17-55 i am wondering whether the 24-70L can be worth £200 more?
I really liked the 17-55 and although it was a little on the short side for me it did give me the means of shooting large groups in fairly tight spaces. I was reading the review in The Digital Picture and it stated that the 17-55 was sharper at ALL overlapping focal distances. I am not going to go for the 24-105L due to needing this for some low light work so i was wondering if anyone has used both of these lenses could they tell me if the 24-70L is that much better or could my other £200 be put to better use?
I use a 50D just now and have no real plans to go full frame for a while anyway.
I really liked the 17-55 and although it was a little on the short side for me it did give me the means of shooting large groups in fairly tight spaces. I was reading the review in The Digital Picture and it stated that the 17-55 was sharper at ALL overlapping focal distances. I am not going to go for the 24-105L due to needing this for some low light work so i was wondering if anyone has used both of these lenses could they tell me if the 24-70L is that much better or could my other £200 be put to better use?
I use a 50D just now and have no real plans to go full frame for a while anyway.