- Messages
- 5,007
- Name
- Tim
- Edit My Images
- Yes
True - are you waiting for the right one to come along?
No, I'm waiting to not be poor.
And I don't want to swap mid wedding season.
True - are you waiting for the right one to come along?
It's certainly not something you need with modern day cameras, especially Nikon as you can get the exposure quite wrong and it doesn't matter. I'm not saying that you should do this or rely on this of course, but it's obviously not as critical as it once once.Guess I was spoilt by trying the Riii first!!
I must admit seeing the change of exposure in the viewfinder was interesting, but not sure if its something you need in RAW?!
TBH even with my EM1 I will sometimes change exposure in PP as what you see in the EVF/LCD and what you see on your computer can be two different things. Even if you go by the histogram as you know it's only showing the jpeg so it's not 100% reliable. What I'm saying is that whether I'm using my D850 or my EM1 my need to tweak or not tweak exp values is the same.That is my biggest draw to mirrorless. Getting your exposure bang on every time saves so much time in editing!
I have used and still use an EVF (in preference to the OVF on my Fuji X100T) and TBH I can't say that they show me what I'm going to get. It certainly doesn't help me with focus - the supposed focussing aids only serve as distractions to me. DOF is increased over the final use of the image because the EVF is smaller. Colours and exposure aren't consistent with final use either. It's just a framing device like an OVF to my eyes. One that drains the battery too.IMO the biggest draw in mirrorless is what you see is what you get. Especially focus/dof.
How do you rate the X100T? I've been toying with the idea of getting the X100 (the one with the bayer sensor) but I'm not sure I can 'cope' with just one focal length, although I do know you can get adapters. How does the hybrid viewfinder work, I'm not sure exactly what you see through the viewfinder? Is it like TTL viewfinders where you see what you're getting, ir is it more like the old rangefinders where it's just a window and you have to guess/get used to what image you're going to get with it? (I should really ask this on the Fuji thread shouldn't I )I have used and still use an EVF (in preference to the OVF on my Fuji X100T) and TBH I can't say that they show me what I'm going to get. It certainly doesn't help me with focus - the supposed focussing aids only serve as distractions to me. DOF is increased over the final use of the image because the EVF is smaller. Colours and exposure aren't consistent with final use either. It's just a framing device like an OVF to my eyes. One that drains the battery too.
The only advantage I've found with mirrorless is when using the rear screen for framing the shot (the D7590 is clunky to use like that) - and a touch screen to move the focus point when doing that is really useful.
Don't go in the Fuji thread. They're strange there!How do you rate the X100T? I've been toying with the idea of getting the X100 (the one with the bayer sensor) but I'm not sure I can 'cope' with just one focal length, although I do know you can get adapters. How does the hybrid viewfinder work, I'm not sure exactly what you see through the viewfinder? Is it like TTL viewfinders where you see what you're getting, ir is it more like the old rangefinders where it's just a window and you have to guess/get used to what image you're going to get with it? (I should really ask this on the Fuji thread shouldn't I )
I might chop my 610 in. Haven’t got any paid stuff booked in until next year and I might just buy another 750 when I need one, given the prices.
Or buy a Sony!
Or buy a Sony!
Nah, I haven’t the spare dough to chop and change.
Sure is a hell of a lot of money.That’s the trouble. Even chopping all my kit in I’m well short of what I need!!!
A7iii + 70-200 2.8 is nearly £4000!!!
FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS!!!
And that’s grey prices too!
And how much is a D850 & 70-200 2.8. Just as much I’m guessing. Not that I’m particularly sticking up for the Sony, would rather have the Nikon personally.That’s the trouble. Even chopping all my kit in I’m well short of what I need!!!
A7iii + 70-200 2.8 is nearly £4000!!!
FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS!!!
And that’s grey prices too!
And how much is a D850 & 70-200 2.8. Just as much I’m guessing. Not that I’m particularly sticking up for the Sony, would rather have the Nikon personally.
But the ultimate question has to be: will it improve you as a photographer, or drastically make the whole experience easier/more enjoyable?
Even if I did have the money, it's not the gear for me that is limiting my photography. I've mellowed where gear is concerned over the years. Sure it's nice to have the latest/best, and I've been on those bandwagons many times, but if you have half decent kit, there's other things that are stopping you. But if the gear is your prozac, then go get your fix and get creative with the wife/bank manager/payday loan shark
I don’t think that’s was the point tbh, it’s the cost to changeAnd how much is a D850 & 70-200 2.8. Just as much I’m guessing. Not that I’m particularly sticking up for the Sony, would rather have the Nikon personally.
My photography hasn’t improved since swapping to the D850 tbh.No is the easy answer. Looking at my images from the weekend they are so clean and the way it handled the low indoor work was amazing. Especially as I forgot and spent all morning in jpeg!!!
Need to step back sometimes and realise what decent kit I actually have. The 70-200 ED is probably one of the best 70-200’s IQ wise eve made.
I’m going to do a little 50mm project over next few months with the yard and horses just to keep me shooting more often. Think it will be fun!
And on another note. Does anyone use peak designs with 70-200 and mount an anchor on the lens? Please note my zoom ring is at the front!
I don’t think that’s was the point tbh, it’s the cost to change
Yeah but D850 is surely A7Riii?
I don’t think that’s was the point tbh, it’s the cost to change
My photography hasn’t improved since swapping to the D850 tbh.
Not the way the Sony a7iii guys bang on about it
My bad, I thought it was cost to buy. Surely it isn't that pricey!
When I had my D750 I looked into it, I was offered around £850 for the D750 and £940 for the 70-200mm f2.8 VRII IIRC. At the time the A7riii was £2300 grey and the Sony 70-200mm f2.8 £2k grey. I’d obviously have had to fork out £2k to get what I already had.Not the way the Sony a7iii guys bang on about it
My bad, I thought it was cost to buy. Surely it isn't that pricey!
It’s a great forum for sure. I hit a plateau ages ago and I’ve not improved since. Tbh as a result it’s led to frustration and to me not going out half as much as I did. Tbh my fibro’s attributed to some of my lack of enthusiasm, but it’s mainly my lack of development. I’ve even considered ditching all the gear and going back to basics, I think this is why I’ve been contemplating the X100 tbh.Mine has improved since listening to peoples advice on here, that’s a big compliment to this place and this thread in particular.
Or wait to see what Canon does!
When I had my D750 I looked into it, I was offered around £850 for the D750 and £940 for the 70-200mm f2.8 VRII IIRC. At the time the A7riii was £2300 grey and the Sony 70-200mm f2.8 £2k grey. I’d obviously have had to fork out £2k to get what I already had.
It’s a great forum for sure. I hit a plateau ages ago and I’ve not improved since. Tbh as a result it’s led to frustration and to me not going out half as much as I did. Tbh my fibro’s attributed to some of my lack of enthusiasm, but it’s mainly my lack of development. I’ve even considered ditching all the gear and going back to basics, I think this is why I’ve been contemplating the X100 tbh.
Sell
D750 £800
70-200 £1400
50mm £100
Buy
A7iii £1600 (grey)
70-200 - £2000 (grey)
50mm - £180 (and the 1.8 looks slow)
Charger - £80
Battery - £60
SD cards - £?
£1600ish before SD cards - plus IMO a worse 50mm.
Keep it sensible, that's your cost to change to new from your 4 yr old camera and last gen lens.
Let's do a real comparison for current new gear...
Z6 - 2200
70-200 fl - 2400
50 - 200
Ftz adapter - 270
---------
5070
A7iii - 2000
70-200 - 2500
50 - 180
Charger - tenner
-----------
4690
You can't price compare old used gear to latest releases.
What’s your point??? We are talking about the cost involved if I wanted to change?
D750 is now £849 brand new with one years warrenty. Second hand must surely start with a 6 now!Sell
D750 £800
70-200 £1400
50mm £100
Buy
A7iii £1600 (grey)
70-200 - £2000 (grey)
50mm - £180 (and the 1.8 looks slow)
Charger - £80
Battery - £60
SD cards - £?
£1600ish before SD cards - plus IMO a worse 50mm.
D750 is now £849 brand new with one years warrenty. Second hand must surely start with a 6 now!
D750 is now £849 brand new with one years warrenty. Second hand must surely start with a 6 now!
50mm ordered today. Just in time for cash back!
For grey versions maybe.
It’s a great forum for sure. I hit a plateau ages ago and I’ve not improved since. Tbh as a result it’s led to frustration and to me not going out half as much as I did. Tbh my fibro’s attributed to some of my lack of enthusiasm, but it’s mainly my lack of development. I’ve even considered ditching all the gear and going back to basics, I think this is why I’ve been contemplating the X100 tbh.
Just getting the motivation that’s the issueGo out and shoot some stuff you've never done before.