pano

RKC

RKC

Messages
4,341
Name
Bob
Edit My Images
Yes
hi all
recently took these pano's
i think they would be better without the dead growth in foreground
does it need more sky
which works best composition wise

thinking i will go back again, so any C&C welcome before my return

1
3226579212_535138c956_o.jpg



2
3226582668_34ccb3e8ba_o.jpg
 
Yes, needs a bit more sky. I prefer the second, the red box in the first is a distraction. The foreground is fine imo. It's a nice pano, hard to get them to hold interest but the second one does.
 
A bit more sky would be nice I think, also I would be curious to see what if you were to take the camera near to those rocks, there seems to be interesting water features in the rocks which could make it a nice foreground attraction?

Overall, I do prefer the second shot myself! Good try!
 
awhyu
A bit more sky would be nice I think, also I would be curious to see what if you were to take the camera near to those rocks, there seems to be interesting water features in the rocks which could make it a nice foreground attraction?

Overall, I do prefer the second shot myself! Good try!
Click to expand...

Thanks for comment, not sure about the rocks, if my memory is right i was stood on edge of curve, but shall have a look when i go back

neo2810
Yes, needs a bit more sky. I prefer the second, the red box in the first is a distraction. The foreground is fine imo. It's a nice pano, hard to get them to hold interest but the second one does.
Click to expand...

Thanks for comment, was'nt sure about the red box myself, distraction or added interest

i am just experimenting with panos at the moment, but enjoying every moment, i have few in mind so just trying to perfect my technique
thanks for comments
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top