I attended a 2 day studio / photoshop course a few months ago.
We had a discussion regarding the advantages of RAW over JPG shooting and it was agreed that RAW gave you much better quality and corrective possibilites over the image later on in the processing process.
Since trying this at home I have found the raw shots to be a bit dull compared to my jpgs. I am unsure whether this is to do with bad exposure or lighting set-up or because they are raw?
My main question is if you shoot in raw and have perfect exposure and lighting set-up would the image still look dull, would you always have to do some processing to liven up the picture?
We had a discussion regarding the advantages of RAW over JPG shooting and it was agreed that RAW gave you much better quality and corrective possibilites over the image later on in the processing process.
Since trying this at home I have found the raw shots to be a bit dull compared to my jpgs. I am unsure whether this is to do with bad exposure or lighting set-up or because they are raw?
My main question is if you shoot in raw and have perfect exposure and lighting set-up would the image still look dull, would you always have to do some processing to liven up the picture?