AD_Capturs
Mummy, where do babies come from?
- Messages
- 4,571
- Name
- Anthony
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Anyone have any experience with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG IF HSM?
If so how good is it?
If so how good is it?
you mean for a filter? i will be using it on a canon 1000d so its a crop
Ive heard its good - no experience first hand though
Supposedly better than the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L

This must be a very good joke
Canon is not perfect for what it costs, but it completely destroys the Sigma day and night. In fact I found the Sigma unusable completely - worst lens I had ever owned. Be warned.
Ive heard its good - no experience first hand though
Supposedly better than the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L
Um, the Sigma is a third of the price of the Canon, even I suspect that if it was better sales would have slumped to zero and ebay would be be full of them at cut throat prices and that is just not the case.
Was just in the process of altering my post, a little too late it seems.
I have one, Nikon fit, wide open its really (too) soft, stopped down its very good.
This must be a very good joke
Canon is not perfect for what it costs, but it completely destroys the Sigma day and night. In fact I found the Sigma unusable completely - worst lens I had ever owned. Be warned.
Yes that is what I meant to say, 82mm filters are expensive so by using a step down ring, you can use the cheaper 77mm filters. I use a polarizing or a B+W 10 stop filter on mine.
I've got one (Nikon fit on a D90) and love it, very happy with it
Its a very heavy lens though but build quality is excellent
Seems a touch soft at f2.8 at 70mm though but nice and sharp at shorter focal lengths
really - have no complaints about sharpness wide open on either a 5D2 or 40D.
what camera you using it on?
FlyTVR said:I've got the non-hsm version of the Sigma 24-70. Great lens but it's certainly soft at 2.8.
I also own the Canon 24-70 2.8L. Personally, the Canon is in a different league - but that's just my findings.
Cheers.
Dav