Heading for my 2nd lens upgrade. Well a much needed upgrade from the kit lens. But damn which of these I have chosen? I have pros and cons. Anybody fancy adding some more
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non VC
Pros:
Cheap
Cheap
Cheap
Great IQ (supposed)
Highly recommended
Could be mine by the end of next month
constant f2.8
Cons:
No IS
built wise as good as the kit lens (cheap)
old
hard rumours that will be discontinued
not half as sexy as its competitors down here.
Canon 15-85 IS USM
Pros:
Stunning IQ
IS USM
Brand new
big but not too big
Sexy
Cons:
Def not cheap
no lens hood
NO f2.8 (a bit of a draw back)
will be some time till I get it, around Sept (could I way that long??)
not as sexy as the coming lens
Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS USM
Pros:
Stunning IQ
constant f2.8
solid built (for a non L)
big and macho
instant orgasim
Cons
Bloody expensive
Bloody expensive
Bloody expensive
no lens hood
expensive indeed
will take me till end of year to get it
Not sure if camera upgrade is FF or 7d
Tamron 17-50 2.8 non VC
Pros:
Cheap
Cheap
Cheap
Great IQ (supposed)
Highly recommended
Could be mine by the end of next month
constant f2.8
Cons:
No IS
built wise as good as the kit lens (cheap)
old
hard rumours that will be discontinued
not half as sexy as its competitors down here.
Canon 15-85 IS USM
Pros:
Stunning IQ
IS USM
Brand new
big but not too big
Sexy
Cons:
Def not cheap
no lens hood
NO f2.8 (a bit of a draw back)
will be some time till I get it, around Sept (could I way that long??)
not as sexy as the coming lens
Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS USM
Pros:
Stunning IQ
constant f2.8
solid built (for a non L)
big and macho
instant orgasim
Cons
Bloody expensive
Bloody expensive
Bloody expensive
no lens hood
expensive indeed
will take me till end of year to get it
Not sure if camera upgrade is FF or 7d
