excalibur2
My F4's Broken...
- Messages
- 11,781
- Name
- Brian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
H'mm.....the XA2 keeps being mentioned but the XA is superior.
I get nose bleeds going north of the Thames so most of you are northerners to me!
I also have to give a mention to the Minolta Dynax 9, a beast of a camera with autoexposure and autofocus that was a match for the Nikon F5 and focal plane shutter that went from 30seconds to - 1/12,000 of a second, now that's fast
The XA has aperture priority and a rangefinder, having owned and used both the XA and XA2 i'd take the XA2 if i wanted that style of body. The XA rangefinder is tiny, fiddly and **** poor in lower light, i actually got more out of focus shots from the XA than i did with the XA2's zone focus options. The only advantage the XA offers is the aperture priority metering with shutter speed in the viewfinder, but the XA2's meter is considered to be more accurate than the XA, particularly when it comes to slide film.H'mm.....the XA2 keeps being mentioned but the XA is superior.
Innovative is a whole other top 10 list - probably would include many cameras that were firsts, but many of them were also commercial failures.