1. chrism_scotland

    chrism_scotland

    Messages:
    8,081
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The A9 is more in line with the 1DX but really depends what your shooting, if its a backup then maybe you don't need exactly the same performance?
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  2. Raymond Lin

    Raymond Lin

    Messages:
    6,330
    Name:
    Raymond
    Edit My Images:
    No
    All big lenses....or very similar size to the Canon.

    You’ll save a bit of weight on the body and if you are used to the 1D body then a Sony body will be too short for you...add a grip then you are back to square 1, saving nothing, especially not money.

    Don’t buy a Sony for weight saving if you intend to get G-Master (or any fast aperture) lenses.
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2018
  3. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Indeed.

    The best way to use a sony is with 1.8ish prime lenses and no batter grip.

    You are pretty much set if you buy a 25/35/55/85 primes . all 4 lenses are probably weighing less then a single 70-200 f2.8!

    Anyways i do notice the AF on the r3 vs the a9. The A9 is just too damm good at af. on another level but the r3 af is fine for a lot of stuff.

    A9 also does landscape really well!

    [​IMG]JDR05819.jpg by Jon Richy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]JDR05166-Pano.jpg by Jon Richy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]JDR05335.jpg by Jon Richy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]AbuDhabi-A9-shots-pt1-706.jpg by Jon Richy, on Flickr
     
    michaelg and razor777 like this.
  4. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
  5. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    hardly surprising! tamron is an excellent buy. But its more about the size than money
     
  6. JohnBradbury

    JohnBradbury A jolly good egg!

    Messages:
    721
    Name:
    John
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    What's the silent mode like on the A7R iii?

    I'm not overly familiar with mirrorless technology, are there downsides to using the electronic shutter to reduce noise?
     
  7. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Possible rolling shutter effect and possible banding under artificial flickering light.

    The former has never bothered me but the latter can ruin a picture with no way that I can see to fix it.
     
  8. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Fstoppers reviews the A7III...

    https://fstoppers.com/originals/camera-you-should-want-fstoppers-reviews-sony-a7-iii-250186

    And just in case you simply can't wait to know that they say...

    "While there's always room for improvement, it's hard to find serious faults with the camera Sony has made at the price point it sits at. Simply put, the Sony a7 III is the best all-around camera out there, and it's priced at a truly impressive point. With its great sensor, excellent autofocus performance, high frame rate, excellent low-light performance, good battery life, and high-quality video output, there are few situations or genres it can't tackle with ease. While the crazy frame rate of the a9 and the high resolution of the a7R III are often the talk around photography circles, the a7 III quietly checks almost every box 95 percent of photographers and videographers need checked at a price far below those of its bigger siblings, and for that, it's a no-brainer to recommend it wholeheartedly."

    That's nice.
    :D
     
    Prize78 likes this.
  9. footman

    footman

    Messages:
    3,404
    Name:
    Laurence
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Returned from France yesterday early because of continuous bad weather, not what I'd wanted to try out the new kit, poor light almost all the time. All taken with A7R3 and 100-400 GM.
    [​IMG]
    5.6 1/1000 ISO 2000 400mm

    [​IMG]
    5.6 1/2000 ISO 400 400mm, enormous crop. I get 1 shot of a swallow in flight and it's having a poo!

    [​IMG]
    5.6 1/2000 ISO 1250 400mm
    I think it's a damselfly.

    [​IMG]
    Just for the hell of it, standing in the trees for shelter!
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2018
  10. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    At the rumor site... "Full leaked press text of the new Samyang 24mm f2.8."

    Read all about it...

    https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/full-leaked-press-text-of-the-new-samyang-24mm-f-2-8-fe-lens/

    And on the subject of the rise of third party AF lenses Thom Hogan says it's "Another problem for the duopoly."

    Read it here...

    http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/another-problem-for-the.html

    I may just be in a grumpy mood today but I find him increasingly irritating and... desperate maybe.

    And on the subject of competition, a new FF Leica is coming...

    Steve Huff is looking forward to it...

    http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2018/06/09/so-the-new-leica-is-coming-the-cm-place-your-bets/
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2018
  11. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Only 93g!! If its as good as 35mm/2.8 they have I'll definitely buy one. I really miss the minolta 24mm f2.8 AF prime from my a-mount days. I was really hoping for a small 24mm prime and finally its here!
     
  12. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Too heavy
     
  13. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Yup. It's the size of a DSLR and 24-70mm f2.8. I thought these csc's were supposed to be smaller. What's the point...

    Anyway, despite the girth and weight I'm tempted but I have two manual 24mm f2.8's, Rokkor and Zuiko.
     
  14. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    its 120g with the hood, i guess that just makes is a brick then
     
  15. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    The hood looks tiny but I suppose it does do some good. Any news on the price yet?
     
  16. T_J_G

    T_J_G

    Messages:
    3,667
    Name:
    Tim
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Would be decent on my little A6000, definitely one to keep an eye on
     
    woof woof likes this.
  17. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I hadn't thought of that. One thing that's always put me off the A6xxx series is that there's no compact 35mm equivalent lens. All there's been to date AFAIK are the Sigma 19mm and the Sony 20mm f2.8's and of course the relatively large and relatively expensive Sony 24mm f1.8. It is a shame that this Samyang is f2.8 though, f1.8 would be better on an A6xxx APS-C camera.
     
  18. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Did you forget to put the smiley on that post?
     
    jonneymendoza likes this.
  19. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    The rumor site says that the Samyang 24mm f2.8 has been announced...

    https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/new-samyang-24mm-f-2-8-fe-lens-announced-and-reviewed/#disqus_thread

    Review...

    https://www.ephotozine.com/article/samyang-af-24mm-f-2-8-fe-review-32367

    A few snippets from that review...

    "Sharpness is crisp and precise and it is no surprise to see that centrally it rates as excellent from f/2.8 all the way through to f/16. Diffraction results in a slight drop at f/22, but even here it is still very good.

    The edges are a close match, being excellent from f/2.8 to f/11 and still very good at f/16 and f/22. Even using the full frame image sharpness is really even across the frame and every aperture is totally usable."

    "The Samyang AF 24mm f/2.8 FE lens is priced at £279.99, a very fair and equitable amount to ask."

    "We seem to have gone full circle and classic prime lenses, once the only choice, are seemingly being rediscovered and once again becoming highly sought after. Compact, high quality and reasonable priced it is not difficult to see why. The optical designs have in some cases benefited from modern technologies and glasses and they can comfortably surpass the performance of their predecessors.

    This is where we find the Samyang AF 24mm f/2.8 lens – superb performance, compact size, excellent price and a compelling focal length to use. There's nothing to dislike, everything to like and an obvious Editor's Choice."

    That's nice :D

    I can see this selling well :D

    I have two manual 24mm f2.8's and no time to use them... so I'll probably end up buying this :D
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2018
    stevelmx5 likes this.
  20. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
  21. stevelmx5

    stevelmx5

    Messages:
    9,086
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No

    It's nice to see that the 3rd parties are trying to deliver lenses that don't massively compromise on quality but are still offered at more reasonable prices. I can see me moving over to a Tamron 28-75, Samyang 24/2.8 and possibly an FE85/1.8 as a 3 lens setup. I wonder if Sony will stick to their higher-priced lenses and leave the 3rd parties to the rest or will they release their own lenses to compete?

    Clearly it's possible to build good quality glass at reasonable prices and in compact sizes, something Sony hasn't really bothered doing up to now but maybe the competition as positive reviews will make them try.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2018
  22. F/1.4

    F/1.4

    Messages:
    1,846
    Name:
    Anthony
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I will be having one of the Samyang 24 2.8 lenses! Any word on release date ?
     
  23. Barrysprout

    Barrysprout

    Messages:
    6,129
    Name:
    Colin
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Couple of places suggest July. Pre-order is live on Wex.
     
    F/1.4 likes this.
  24. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I going down this route but with a 35mm f1.4 for a 4 lens setup :D
    Still haven't received my tamron though :(
     
    stevelmx5 likes this.
  25. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I've been thinking about the 24mm f2.8 whilst out today and whilst I'd probably like one I've been a bit spoilt by having 17 and 19mm lenses. Thinking back to my DSLR days I didn't have a 24mm, I had a Sigma 12-24mm which was excellent and a Sigma 20mm f1.8 which wasn't great at f1.8 but stopped down it was excellent. These days I'd settle for a compact and well priced 20mm f2.8 even if it's not as good as the larger offerings like the Tokina Firin f2 which is neither compact or all that cheap.

    Maybe Samyang or someone else will get around to a 20mm f2.8 at some point. Assuming my eyesight doesn't go and stop me from using manual lenses I might just hold off on the 24mm and see if a 20mm f2.8 comes out.
     
  26. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    6,232
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
  27. Riz_Guru

    Riz_Guru

    Messages:
    6,232
    Name:
    Riz
    Edit My Images:
    No
    No more Sony GAS for me... moving house next week and I have a cunning plan in my head to build a home cinema :eek: £££
     
    ChrisHeathcote likes this.
  28. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    stevelmx5, Riz_Guru and nandbytes like this.
  29. woof woof

    woof woof

    Messages:
    18,394
    Name:
    Alan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Meh, primes :D
     
  30. twist

    twist

    Messages:
    14,396
    Edit My Images:
    No
    +1
     
  31. simonbarker

    simonbarker

    Messages:
    1,869
    Edit My Images:
    No
  32. Dave Semmens

    Dave Semmens

    Messages:
    1,871
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Stopped reading it when I saw the 24-70GM a few places higher than the 16-35GM - they must be on fricking drugs LOL
     
  33. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    overall 24-70mm is probably a better "general" recommendation for a lens than 16-35mm. not everyone needs the UWA
     
    Riz_Guru likes this.
  34. Dave Semmens

    Dave Semmens

    Messages:
    1,871
    Name:
    Dave
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It says best lenses - the 24-70 is in no way better than the16-35.

    Not sure how they can score something down as it is not as popular a focal length - surely it has to be reviewed on the technical aspects of the lens?
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2018
  35. nandbytes

    nandbytes

    Messages:
    4,064
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    yeah "best" is probably the wrong word to use for that list. Its like saying "best" camera. There is no such thing as best camera or lenses. I certainly would not buy most of their top 10s lol
     
    Dave Semmens likes this.
  36. dcash29

    dcash29

    Messages:
    2,378
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Then theres the alternative option to the 16-35

    _DSC0562small.jpg _DSC0635small.jpg
     
  37. ChrisHeathcote

    ChrisHeathcote

    Messages:
    3,626
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I have to admit to having a sweet spot for the 16-35mm f4 however the very compact size of these Samyang lenses are very appealing.

    I like my Sigma Art 35mm however it is a little on the large side for general wandering about. I have been toying with the 35mm 2.8 for a while. However as I already have one 35mm already I’ve been reluctant. Although I can see the 35mm and 55mm to be a nice small day to day set up. 35mm for general and 55 when I want to get a bit closer. I had also been thinking of ditching the primes and getting the 24-105. Damn the Sony GAS
     
  38. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Meh. Both
     
  39. Bollygum

    Bollygum

    Messages:
    442
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Odd they they don't list either the Sony Zeiss 50mm f1.4 or the Zeiss Loxia 21mm. I guess that there are a lot of factors that go into the mix when evaluating a lens. I think that both of those lenses are right up there
     
  40. jonneymendoza

    jonneymendoza

    Messages:
    7,015
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Hi all i am looking at an ipad or ipad pro for travelling with. The main use for a tablet is to watch and consume movies offline, browse the net, maybe play a few games here and there and to also view raws and maybe make use of lightroom mobile.

    My question is, can the ipad pro/normal one be able to connect to an external hdd or even an sd card reader?
     
    Riz_Guru and footman like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice