- Messages
- 17,353
- Name
- Bob
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Yeah, we know it's good. You don't need to post any pics....My 70-180 arrived this morning. I am really impressed with it...
Yeah, we know it's good. You don't need to post any pics....My 70-180 arrived this morning. I am really impressed with it...
Canon 100-300 isn't too bad actually for landscapes stopped down to f8.Realistically I don't need either of them. Whichever I go for will mostly be used for landscape shots so not having the 2.8 is not a major concern but likewise I don't really need the reach of a 400mm. Should maybe just stick with the canon 100-300
Lovely images, was there 2 years ago, last time I did some decent walking, unlikely to be repeated sadly.Dent, Yorkshire Dales (though technically Cumbria). Please excuse the stupid copyright logo, I was messing about with lightroom and forgot to turn it off.
1
DSC09444 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
2
DSC09430-2 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
3
DSC09407 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
4
DSC09413 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
5
DSC09359-2 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
6
DSC09279 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
7
DSC09272-2 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
8
DSC09324 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
Lovely images, was there 2 years ago, last time I did some decent walking, unlikely to be repeated sadly.
welcome to TP.I have been a Nikon girl for years. Just switching to the A7. EEK
I have been a Nikon girl for years. Just switching to the A7. EEK
I’ve finally got out with the camera and taken a photo I’m thinking of keeping! It’s only a quick edit to see if it’s worth spending more time editing later in the week (it’s probably a little underexposed and the WB is a little warm).
View attachment 284669
I was very impressed with the A9 getting this as I don’t think I could have got it on any of my previous cameras. I wanted to get a low view point but I’d left the centre column in the travel tripod I was using so I couldn’t get as low as I wanted. I thought I’d tried something I’d never tried before, hand holding the 100-400 about 4-6 inches above the ground whilst kneeling on the ground and using the the back screen tilted upwards. I used zone focus (set towards the top left corner) rather than my usual single AF point as the screen wasn’t the easiest to see with reflected sunlight and keeping a single point on the fallow deer would have been difficult.
Auto ISO in manual mode (1/1250, f5.6, ISO 200) with exposure compensation set at -2.
They look like some good poppies. I went out last week after the heavy rain only to find most of the poppies destroyed by the rain.
Very nice Love no3 and the way it lead's in from right to leftThanks, first time I've been and I wasn't heading there. Just went out for a drive and that's where I ended up
A few more from the day
1.
DSC09473-2 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
2.
DSC09193 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
3.
DSC09185 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
4.
DSC09166 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
left side seems noticeably better than right side to me.
I personally wouldn't keep that lens or see if you can get it fixed.
I personally wouldn't keep that lens or see if you can get it fixed.
...might even be better to just get it fixed rather than going through 3-4 copies.
Not much talk about the Tamron 28-200 on here - anyone interested in it or tried it yet ?
Somewhat interested....
my current travel kit is 16-35GM, 24-105, 70-180mm with FE55.
Could change it to 16-35GM, 28-200mm, 24GM and FE55, I really liked having 24GM in the past.
But it'll need get very close to the quality of 24-105mm and 70-180mm for me to consider going down this route and what are the chances?
Somewhat interested....
my current travel kit is 16-35GM, 24-105, 70-180mm with FE55.
Could change it to 16-35GM, 28-200mm, 24GM and FE55, I really liked having 24GM in the past.
But it'll need get very close to the quality of 24-105mm and 70-180mm for me to consider going down this route and what are the chances?
Just how good is the 16-35GM? It is payday tomorrow and Im thinking of a wide lens but was leaning towards the F4 version as Im assuming it would be stopped down most of the time. Would I notice much difference on my a7R2 between the F4 and the GM? In the centre they are meant to be pretty similar..
Living in London Im determined to get out more to take photo's after being locked down for so long and I have never been a wide person so that is my new challenge for the next few months. Im thinking Tube stations have some great opportunities for wide photography and there are always lots of funky buildings of course.
Id have to sell my recently purchased XT3 to afford the GM though, I guess if I bought it back later on it would be cheaper as time goes on..
F2.8 or F4....
Decisions...
Not much talk about the Tamron 28-200 on here - anyone interested in it or tried it yet ?
Not much talk about the Tamron 28-200 on here - anyone interested in it or tried it yet ?