- Messages
- 1,066
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Sorry I assume this has been asked before, but I cannot find it.
Ive got a 100-400L and its quite good, I do feel at times its a little too soft for my liking though. The rest of my equipment is as per my sig.
I would like to replace the 100-400 with a 400mm Prime, but which one.
Initially I was looking at the 400mm F4 DO IS, as its lightweight and compact size look great for several hours of motorsport.
But for more or less the same money I could get a 300mm F2.8 L IS USM, which is only a little bigger, it quite a lot heavier, but also one of Canons sharpest lenses, and is said to produce better results then the 400 DO, even when used with a 1.4x TC (which I already have) making it a 420mm F4 IS USM.
The next option is the daddy, the 400mm f/2.8L IS USM, this is within my budget, but I doubt I could carry the thing all day.
The forth option that has been pointed out to me is the 400mm F5.6L which is perhaps the budget L option, but as it hasnt got IS I dismissed this idea.
Has anyone else been in this position before me and if so what lens solution did you pick, as photography is simply a hobby and not a job, i dont know whether to just stick with what I have.
If I do decide on either a 300 or 400 prime, I will definately sell the 100-400 and get a 70-200L F2.8 IS for the short range.
Thanks very much for any help or advice, Darryn.
Ive got a 100-400L and its quite good, I do feel at times its a little too soft for my liking though. The rest of my equipment is as per my sig.
I would like to replace the 100-400 with a 400mm Prime, but which one.
Initially I was looking at the 400mm F4 DO IS, as its lightweight and compact size look great for several hours of motorsport.
But for more or less the same money I could get a 300mm F2.8 L IS USM, which is only a little bigger, it quite a lot heavier, but also one of Canons sharpest lenses, and is said to produce better results then the 400 DO, even when used with a 1.4x TC (which I already have) making it a 420mm F4 IS USM.
The next option is the daddy, the 400mm f/2.8L IS USM, this is within my budget, but I doubt I could carry the thing all day.
The forth option that has been pointed out to me is the 400mm F5.6L which is perhaps the budget L option, but as it hasnt got IS I dismissed this idea.
Has anyone else been in this position before me and if so what lens solution did you pick, as photography is simply a hobby and not a job, i dont know whether to just stick with what I have.
If I do decide on either a 300 or 400 prime, I will definately sell the 100-400 and get a 70-200L F2.8 IS for the short range.
Thanks very much for any help or advice, Darryn.