All the shutter does is control the amount of light to the film, if not used then no way can light get to the film.Cloth curtains on a S3 and S1A. I've run through the speeds with the back open and lens cap removed, and all seems to be working well in that respect. It's the potential for light leaks that is concerning me. I don't know if it's an issue, or not.
If the cloth is stretched to the point that the opaque coating is compromised then light will leak to the film.All the shutter does is control the amount of light to the film, if not used then no way can light get to the film.
All the shutter does is control the amount of light to the film, if not used then no way can light get to the film.
erm how? When the mirror is down it stops all light getting through. When people have problems with light leaks it's problems with seals.....mirror, back etcIf the cloth is stretched to the point that the opaque coating is compromised then light will leak to the film.
......but we are talking about Neville's Pentax bodies and mentions S3 and S1a Welcome to the shoehorning club, I'm good at it tooThere are no seals around the mirror and light can reach the film/sensor around all four edge of the mirror. That is assuming there is a mirror there in the first place. I mentioned my Zarya camera - it is a viewfinder camera with no mirror. Leica rangefinders (and their derivatives: Zorki, Fed, Mir, Read, Canon and others) also have curtain shutters and no mirror.
Speaking from experience, wrinkles in the titanium curtains of Canon rangefinder bodies and Nikon Fs had no obvious effects. I imagine that a bent blade in a Copal Square or similar bladed shutter would be a different matter.BTW if you get a kink or wrinkle in a more modern camera with a metal shutter then you have a problem.
Well none of my cameras have shutter curtain wrinkles, but the oldest camera I use is 1960 Pentax S3 (thrown Zeniths etc away) and latest is the Nikon F4..................... and how you get them is a mystery, unless you know?Speaking from experience, wrinkles in the titanium curtains of Canon rangefinder bodies and Nikon Fs had no obvious effects. I imagine that a bent blade in a Copal Square or similar bladed shutter would be a different matter.
I don't know but my first guess would be someone putting their finger where their finger shouldn't be put!and how you get them is a mystery, unless you know?
Still no seals around the mirror.......but we are talking about Neville's Pentax bodies and mentions S3 and S1a Welcome to the shoehorning club, I'm good at it too
BTW if you get a kink or wrinkle in a more modern camera with a metal shutter then you have a problem.
I don't know but my first guess would be someone putting their finger where their finger shouldn't be put!
Still no seals around the mirror.